Chameleon: Benchmarking Detection and Backtracking on Commercial-Grade AI-Generated Videos
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The proliferation of AI-Generated Content (AIGC), especially deepfake videos, poses a severe threat to social trust by enabling fraud, privacy violations and disinformation. Existing AI-generated video detection (AGVD) benchmarks focus on open-source model generated videos, yet commercial closed-source models produce more realistic, temporally coherent videos that are underexplored in detection research. To fill this gap, we present Chameleon, a commercial-grade dataset with 1,700 AI-generated videos from 600 real-world sources across three key domains (News, Speech, Recommendation), featuring high resolution, rich annotations and 3D consistency metrics for dynamic scene spatial coherence, shifting detection from face-centric forgery to holistic scene forensics. This benchmark assesses models on two core tasks: accurate AI video detection in real-world conditions and forensic backtracking of original sources. Experimental results reveal critical limitations of existing methods in detecting and backtracking high-fidelity, spatiotemporally consistent videos from commercial closed-source models, highlighting current methods' flawed forensic reasoning and establishing Chameleon as a vital challenge for AIGC security research. The code and data are available at https://github.com/lxixim/Chameleon.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2025.
Builds on
26 of 51 references.
References · 26
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
- 2021VideoGPT: Video Generation using VQ-VAE and Transformerscited by 658
- 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
- 2024Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Modelscited by 477
- 2021PointCLIP: Point Cloud Understanding by CLIPcited by 463
- 2019The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Datasetcited by 209
- 2021WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detectioncited by 209
- 2022Self-supervised Learning of Adversarial Example: Towards Good Generalizations for Deepfake Detectioncited by 173
- 2023Raising the Bar of AI-generated Image Detection with CLIPcited by 164
14 more
- 2019FakeCatcher: Detection of Synthetic Portrait Videos using Biological Signalscited by 145
- 2021Representative Forgery Mining for Fake Face Detectioncited by 108
- 2024DeMamba: AI-Generated Video Detection on Million-Scale GenVideo Benchmarkcited by 92
- 2021Spatiotemporal Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 88
- 2023Evading Watermark based Detection of AI-Generated Contentcited by 78
- 2024Can ChatGPT Detect DeepFakes? A Study of Using Multimodal Large Language Models for Media Forensicscited by 69
- 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 53
- 2022A Continual Deepfake Detection Benchmark: Dataset, Methods, and Essentialscited by 45
- 2023Rethinking the Up-Sampling Operations in CNN-based Generative Network for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 41
- 2021CoReD: Generalizing Fake Media Detection with Continual Representation using Distillationcited by 37
- 2024Matten: Video Generation with Mamba-Attentioncited by 24
- 2024Organic or Diffused: Can We Distinguish Human Art from AI-generated Images?cited by 21
- 2023Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts: Investigating Features for ChatGPTcited by 19
- 2024Semi-Truths: A Large-Scale Dataset of AI-Augmented Images for Evaluating Robustness of AI-Generated Image detectorscited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.