Nonlinear Meta-Learning Can Guarantee Faster Rates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many recent theoretical works on meta-learning aim to achieve guarantees in leveraging similar representational structures from related tasks towards simplifying a target task. The main aim of theoretical guarantees on the subject is to establish the extent to which convergence rates -- in learning a common representation -- may scale with the number N of tasks (as well as the number of samples per task). First steps in this setting demonstrate this property when both the shared representation amongst tasks, and task-specific regression functions, are linear. This linear setting readily reveals the benefits of aggregating tasks, e.g., via averaging arguments. In practice, however, the representation is often highly nonlinear, introducing nontrivial biases in each task that cannot easily be averaged out as in the linear case. In the present work, we derive theoretical guarantees for meta-learning with nonlinear representations. In particular, assuming the shared nonlinearity maps to an infinite dimensional reproducing kernel Hilbert space, we show that additional biases can be mitigated with careful regularization that leverages the smoothness of task-specific regression functions, yielding improved rates that scale with the number of tasks as desired.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2023.
Builds on
26 of 62 references.
References · 26
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2020Few-Shot Learning via Learning the Representation, Provablycited by 214
- 2015The Benefit of Multitask Representation Learningcited by 195
- 2018Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalencescited by 192
- 2020On the Theory of Transfer Learning: The Importance of Task Diversitycited by 186
- 2019Adaptive Gradient-Based Meta-Learning Methodscited by 183
- 2017Domain Generalization by Marginal Transfer Learningcited by 180
- 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 164
- 2020Provable Meta-Learning of Linear Representationscited by 161
- 2019Linearized two-layers neural networks in high dimensioncited by 155
- 2019Online Meta-Learningcited by 137
- 2017Sobolev Norm Learning Rates for Regularized Least-Squares Algorithmcited by 114
14 more
- 2015Less is More: Nystr"om Computational Regularizationcited by 91
- 2016Optimal Rates For Regularization Of Statistical Inverse Learning Problemscited by 68
- 2013Divide and Conquer Kernel Ridge Regression: A Distributed Algorithm with Minimax Optimal Ratescited by 65
- 2022Optimally tackling covariate shift in RKHS-based nonparametric regressioncited by 54
- 2019Learning-to-Learn Stochastic Gradient Descent with Biased Regularizationcited by 49
- 2019Eigenvalue and Generalized Eigenvalue Problems: Tutorialcited by 46
- 2020Meta-learning for mixed linear regressioncited by 44
- 2020Learning Polynomials of Few Relevant Dimensionscited by 34
- 2023Learning from Similar Linear Representations: Adaptivity, Minimaxity, and Robustnesscited by 28
- 2017Convergence Analysis of Deterministic Kernel-Based Quadrature Rules in Misspecified Settingscited by 16
- 2022An elementary analysis of ridge regression with random designcited by 15
- 2014A chain rule for the expected suprema of Gaussian processescited by 13
- 2020A Distribution-Dependent Analysis of Meta-Learningcited by 6
- 2021Meta-strategy for Learning Tuning Parameters with Guaranteescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024Transformers are Minimax Optimal Nonparametric In-Context Learnerscited by 37
- 2023Towards Optimal Sobolev Norm Rates for the Vector-Valued Regularized Least-Squares Algorithmcited by 22
- 2023Sample-Efficient Linear Representation Learning from Non-IID Non-Isotropic Datacited by 13
- 2024Help Me Help You: The Aggregate Value of Source and Target Data in Transfer Learningcited by 4
- 2025Doubly-Robust Estimation of Counterfactual Policy Mean Embeddingscited by 3
- 2024Guarantees for Nonlinear Representation Learning: Non-identical Covariates, Dependent Data, Fewer Samplescited by 2
- 2026Support-Conditioned Flow Matching Is Kernel Smoothingcited by 0
- 2026An Analysis of Self-supervised Pre-training with Dependent Samplescited by 0
- 2026An Analysis of Self-supervised Pre-training with Dependent Samples4 Sep 2026
- 2026Support-Conditioned Flow Matching Is Kernel Smoothing13 May 2026
- 2025Doubly-Robust Estimation of Counterfactual Policy Mean Embeddings3 Jun 2025
- 2024Guarantees for Nonlinear Representation Learning: Non-identical Covariates, Dependent Data, Fewer Samples15 Oct 2024
- 2024Help Me Help You: The Aggregate Value of Source and Target Data in Transfer Learning29 Aug 2024
- 2024Transformers are Minimax Optimal Nonparametric In-Context Learners22 Aug 2024
- 2023Towards Optimal Sobolev Norm Rates for the Vector-Valued Regularized Least-Squares Algorithm12 Dec 2023
- 2023Sample-Efficient Linear Representation Learning from Non-IID Non-Isotropic Data8 Aug 2023