Physics-Based Task Generation through Causal Sequence of Physical Interactions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performing tasks in a physical environment is a crucial yet challenging problem for AI systems operating in the real world. Physics simulation-based tasks are often employed to facilitate research that addresses this challenge. In this paper, first, we present a systematic approach for defining a physical scenario using a causal sequence of physical interactions between objects. Then, we propose a methodology for generating tasks in a physics-simulating environment using these defined scenarios as inputs. Our approach enables a better understanding of the granular mechanics required for solving physics-based tasks, thereby facilitating accurate evaluation of AI systems' physical reasoning capabilities. We demonstrate our proposed task generation methodology using the physics-based puzzle game Angry Birds and evaluate the generated tasks using a range of metrics, including physical stability, solvability using intended physical interactions, and accidental solvability using unintended solutions. We believe that the tasks generated using our proposed methodology can facilitate a nuanced evaluation of physical reasoning agents, thus paving the way for the development of agents for more sophisticated real-world applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2023.
Builds on
15 of 37 references.
References · 15
- 2019RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environmentcited by 669
- 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
- 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 145
- 2019PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoningcited by 137
- 2020CausalWorld: A Robotic Manipulation Benchmark for Causal Structure and Transfer Learningcited by 109
- 2019CoPhy: Counterfactual Learning of Physical Dynamicscited by 80
- 2018IntPhys: A Framework and Benchmark for Visual Intuitive Physics Reasoningcited by 72
- 2019Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoningcited by 60
- 2021PTR: A Benchmark for Part-based Conceptual, Relational, and Physical Reasoningcited by 34
- 2021Phy-Q as a measure for physical reasoning intelligencecited by 10
- 2023ChatGPT4PCG Competition: Character-like Level Generation for Science Birdscited by 8
- 2018The 2017 AIBIRDS Competitioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Aligning Perception, Reasoning, Modeling and Interaction: A Survey on Physical AI
- 2023I-PHYRE: Interactive Physical Reasoning
- 2025APEX: Empowering LLMs with Physics-Based Task Planning for Real-time Insight
- 2025IPR-1: Interactive Physical Reasoner
- 2026KinDER: A Physical Reasoning Benchmark for Robot Learning and Planning
- 2026PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems
- 2018BlockPuzzle - A Challenge in Physical Reasoning and Generalization for Robot Learning ↗
- 2025PhysicsMinions: Winning Gold Medals in the Latest Physics Olympiads with a Coevolutionary Multimodal Multi-Agent System