mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Function Value Learning: Adaptive Learning Rates Based on the Polyak Stepsize and Function Splitting in ERM

arXiv 2307.14528 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2023cs.LG math.OCcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Here we develop variants of SGD (stochastic gradient descent) with an adaptive step size that make use of the sampled loss values. In particular, we focus on solving a finite sum-of-terms problem, also known as empirical risk minimization. We first detail an idealized adaptive method called textttSPS_+ that makes use of the sampled loss values and assumes knowledge of the sampled loss at optimality. This textttSPS_+ is a minor modification of the SPS (Stochastic Polyak Stepsize) method, where the step size is enforced to be positive. We then show that textttSPS_+ achieves the best known rates of convergence for SGD in the Lipschitz non-smooth. We then move onto to develop textttFUVAL, a variant of textttSPS_+ where the loss values at optimality are gradually learned, as opposed to being given. We give three viewpoints of textttFUVAL, as a projection based method, as a variant of the prox-linear method, and then as a particular online SGD method. We then present a convergence analysis of textttFUVAL and experimental results. The shortcomings of our work is that the convergence analysis of textttFUVAL shows no advantage over SGD. Another shortcomming is that currently only the full batch version of textttFUVAL shows a minor advantages of GD (Gradient Descent) in terms of sensitivity to the step size. The stochastic version shows no clear advantage over SGD. We conjecture that large mini-batches are required to make textttFUVAL competitive. Currently the new textttFUVAL method studied in this paper does not offer any clear theoretical or practical advantage. We have chosen to make this draft available online nonetheless because of some of the analysis techniques we use, such as the non-smooth analysis of textttSPS_+, and also to show an apparently interesting approach that currently does not work.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2023.

Builds on

20 of 27 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
  3. 2023Handbook of Convergence Theorems for (Stochastic) Gradient Methodscited by 158
  4. 2018Stochastic model-based minimization of weakly convex functionscited by 157
  5. 2020Better Theory for SGD in the Nonconvex Worldcited by 156
  6. 2018Fast and Faster Convergence of SGD for Over-Parameterized Models and an Accelerated Perceptroncited by 143
  7. 2020Stochastic Polyak Step-size for SGD: An Adaptive Learning Rate for Fast Convergencecited by 137
  8. 2019Painless Stochastic Gradient: Interpolation, Line-Search, and Convergence Ratescited by 119
  9. 2019Adaptive Gradient Descent without Descentcited by 79
  10. 2020SGD for Structured Nonconvex Functions: Learning Rates, Minibatching and Interpolationcited by 66
  11. 2016Efficiency of minimizing compositions of convex functions and smooth mapscited by 59
  12. 2019Revisiting the Polyak step sizecited by 55
8 more
  1. 2019Training Neural Networks for and by Interpolationcited by 45
  2. 2019The importance of better models in stochastic optimizationcited by 32
  3. 2021Stochastic Polyak Stepsize with a Moving Targetcited by 19
  4. 2022Cutting Some Slack for SGD with Adaptive Polyak Stepsizescited by 18
  5. 2021Accelerated, Optimal, and Parallel: Some Results on Model-Based Stochastic Optimizationcited by 14
  6. 2016A Sampling Kaczmarz-Motzkin Algorithm for Linear Feasibilitycited by 7
  7. 2023A Model-Based Method for Minimizing CVaR and Beyondcited by 5
  8. 2022A Stochastic Bundle Method for Interpolating Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

8 papers.