CoBRA: Programming Cognitive Bias in Social Agents Using Classic Social Science Experiments
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces CoBRA, a novel toolkit for systematically specifying agent behavior in LLM-based social simulation. We found that conventional approaches that specify agent behavior through implicit natural-language descriptions often do not yield consistent behavior across models, and the resulting behavior does not capture the nuances of the descriptions. In contrast, CoBRA introduces a model-agnostic way to control agent behavior that lets researchers explicitly specify desired nuances and obtain consistent behavior across models. At the heart of CoBRA is a novel closed-loop system primitive with two components: (1) Cognitive Bias Index that measures the demonstrated cognitive bias of a social agent, by quantifying the agent's reactions in a set of validated classic social science experiments; (2) Behavioral Regulation Engine that aligns the agent's behavior to exhibit controlled cognitive bias. Through CoBRA, we show how to operationalize validated social science knowledge (i.e., classical experiments) as reusable "gym" environments for AI -- an approach that may generalize to richer social and affective simulations beyond bias alone.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 53 of its 126 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.
Builds on
53 of 126 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playing16 Oct
- 2023Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View3 Oct
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior7 Apr
Other references · 50
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,395
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
38 more
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
- 2023SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agentscited by 367
- 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 345
- 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 270
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 263
- 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 180
- 2023Benchmarking Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models as Evaluatorscited by 150
- 2024ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMscited by 149
- 2022PromptChainer: Chaining Large Language Model Prompts through Visual Programmingcited by 134
- 2022TimeLMs: Diachronic Language Models from Twittercited by 131
- 2024Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMscited by 106
- 2025LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Methodcited by 99
- 2024Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectivescited by 94
- 2023Bridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Design Challenges in LLM Interfacescited by 72
- 2022TweetNLP: Cutting-Edge Natural Language Processing for Social Mediacited by 71
- 2023Promptify: Text-to-Image Generation through Interactive Prompt Exploration with Large Language Modelscited by 67
- 2024Are Large Language Models Consistent over Value-laden Questions?cited by 58
- 2023Iterative Motion Editing with Natural Languagecited by 40
- 2024Proactive Conversational Agents with Inner Thoughtscited by 36
- 2023CoQuest: Exploring Research Question Co-Creation with an LLM-based Agentcited by 34
- 2024Decoding Echo Chambers: LLM-Powered Simulations Revealing Polarization in Social Networkscited by 33
- 2025What Prompts Don't Say: Understanding and Managing Underspecification in LLM Promptscited by 32
- 2023LLMs as Workers in Human-Computational Algorithms? Replicating Crowdsourcing Pipelines with LLMscited by 27
- 2023Embedding Democratic Values into Social Media AIs via Societal Objective Functionscited by 25
- 2024Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models: A Survey and Mitigation Experimentscited by 20
- 2024Beyond Probabilities: Unveiling the Misalignment in Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2024Designing for Human-Agent Alignment: Understanding what humans want from their agentscited by 18
- 2025Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 16
- 2025PrefPalette: Personalized Preference Modeling with Latent Attributescited by 16
- 2024Perceptions of Sentient AI and Other Digital Minds: Evidence from the AI, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) Surveycited by 15
- 2024The Echoes of Multilinguality: Tracing Cultural Value Shifts during LM Fine-tuningcited by 10
- 2016Augur: Mining Human Behaviors from Fiction to Power Interactive Systemscited by 5
- 2025The Benefits of Prosociality towards AI Agents: Examining the Effects of Helping AI Agents on Human Well-Beingcited by 3
- 2023Exploring Natural Language Processing Methods for Interactive Behaviour Modellingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.
8 papers.
- 2026RedFlow: Redirect Failure into Action-Level Corrections for Flow-matching VLA Policycited by 4
- 2025Love First, Know Later: Persona-Based Romantic Compatibility Through LLM Text World Enginescited by 3
- 2026When Agents "Misremember" Collectively: Exploring the Mandela Effect in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 2
- 2026HumanStudy-Bench: Towards AI Agent Design for Participant Simulationcited by 2
- 2026Validated Hypotheses as a Lens for Human-Likeness Evaluation in AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026Cross-Domain Molecular Relational Learning: Leveraging Chemical Structure-Activity Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Tipping Points in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems: Stance on Climate Change Actioncited by 0
- 2026Where Do Test-Time Scaling and Training Fall Short in Individual Stance Prediction?cited by 0
- 2026Where Do Test-Time Scaling and Training Fall Short in Individual Stance Prediction?27 Sep 2026
- 2026Tipping Points in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems: Stance on Climate Change Action21 Sep 2026
- 2026RedFlow: Redirect Failure into Action-Level Corrections for Flow-matching VLA Policy30 Jul 2026
- 2026Cross-Domain Molecular Relational Learning: Leveraging Chemical Structure-Activity Analysis16 May 2026
- 2026Validated Hypotheses as a Lens for Human-Likeness Evaluation in AI Agents14 May 2026
- 2026HumanStudy-Bench: Towards AI Agent Design for Participant Simulation31 Jan 2026
- 2026When Agents "Misremember" Collectively: Exploring the Mandela Effect in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems31 Jan 2026
- 2025Love First, Know Later: Persona-Based Romantic Compatibility Through LLM Text World Engines4 Dec 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Sense and Sensitivity: Evaluating the simulation of social dynamics via Large Language Models
- 2025Exploring Large Language Model Agents for Piloting Social Experiments
- 2025The Social Laboratory: A Psychometric Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Evaluation
- 2026Behavioral Determinants of Deployed AI Agents in Social Networks: A Multi-Factor Study of Personality, Model, and Guardrail Specification
- 2025Simulating Generative Social Agents via Theory-Informed Workflow Design
- 2026AgentSociety 2: An Integrated Research Environment for Executable Social Science
- 2026Interpreting and Steering LLM Agents for Social Simulations
- 2024Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates