mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Deep Dive into Perturbations as Evaluation Technique for Time Series XAI

arXiv 2307.05104 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has gained significant attention recently as the demand for transparency and interpretability of machine learning models has increased. In particular, XAI for time series data has become increasingly important in finance, healthcare, and climate science. However, evaluating the quality of explanations, such as attributions provided by XAI techniques, remains challenging. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of using perturbations to evaluate attributions extracted from time series models. A perturbation analysis involves systematically modifying the input data and evaluating the impact on the attributions generated by the XAI method. We apply this approach to several state-of-the-art XAI techniques and evaluate their performance on three time series classification datasets. Our results demonstrate that the perturbation analysis approach can effectively evaluate the quality of attributions and provide insights into the strengths and limitations of XAI techniques. Such an approach can guide the selection of XAI methods for time series data, e.g., focusing on return time rather than precision, and facilitate the development of more reliable and interpretable machine learning models for time series analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2023.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  7. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  8. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  9. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  10. 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 576
  11. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
  12. 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 431
7 more
  1. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
  2. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
  3. 2019Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Seriescited by 67
  4. 2021TS-MULE: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Time Series Forecast Modelscited by 28
  5. 2020An Empirical Study of Explainable AI Techniques on Deep Learning Models For Time Series Taskscited by 8
  6. 2021Time Series Model Attribution Visualizations as Explanationscited by 8
  7. 2022Time to Focus: A Comprehensive Benchmark Using Time Series Attribution Methodscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

11 papers.