A Deep Dive into Perturbations as Evaluation Technique for Time Series XAI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has gained significant attention recently as the demand for transparency and interpretability of machine learning models has increased. In particular, XAI for time series data has become increasingly important in finance, healthcare, and climate science. However, evaluating the quality of explanations, such as attributions provided by XAI techniques, remains challenging. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of using perturbations to evaluate attributions extracted from time series models. A perturbation analysis involves systematically modifying the input data and evaluating the impact on the attributions generated by the XAI method. We apply this approach to several state-of-the-art XAI techniques and evaluate their performance on three time series classification datasets. Our results demonstrate that the perturbation analysis approach can effectively evaluate the quality of attributions and provide insights into the strengths and limitations of XAI techniques. Such an approach can guide the selection of XAI methods for time series data, e.g., focusing on return time rather than precision, and facilitate the development of more reliable and interpretable machine learning models for time series analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2023.
Builds on
19 of 30 references.
References · 19
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 576
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
- 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 431
7 more
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2019Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Seriescited by 67
- 2021TS-MULE: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Time Series Forecast Modelscited by 28
- 2020An Empirical Study of Explainable AI Techniques on Deep Learning Models For Time Series Taskscited by 8
- 2021Time Series Model Attribution Visualizations as Explanationscited by 8
- 2022Time to Focus: A Comprehensive Benchmark Using Time Series Attribution Methodscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2024Time is Not Enough: Time-Frequency based Explanation for Time-Series Black-Box Modelscited by 6
- 2025Class-Dependent Perturbation Effects in Evaluating Time Series Attributionscited by 5
- 2023Introducing the Attribution Stability Indicator: a Measure for Time Series XAI Attributionscited by 3
- 2025Why Do Class-Dependent Evaluation Effects Occur with Time Series Feature Attributions? A Synthetic Data Investigationcited by 2
- 2025Explainable time-series forecasting with sampling-free SHAP for Transformerscited by 2
- 2025Explaining Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection in Energy Consumption Data by Focusing on Contextually Relevant Datacited by 1
- 2026xaitimesynth: A Python Package for Evaluating Attribution Methods for Time Series with Synthetic Ground Truthcited by 1
- 2024Finding the DeepDream for Time Series: Activation Maximization for Univariate Time Seriescited by 0
- 2025Adaptive Law-Based Transformation (ALT): A Lightweight Feature Representation for Time Series Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Does Explanation Correctness Matter? Linking Computational XAI Evaluation to Human Understandingcited by 0
- 2026PhysAttNet: Enhancing Predictive Performance in Industrial and Astrophysical Time Series via Physics-Informed Attentioncited by 0
- 2026PhysAttNet: Enhancing Predictive Performance in Industrial and Astrophysical Time Series via Physics-Informed Attention7 Aug 2026
- 2026Does Explanation Correctness Matter? Linking Computational XAI Evaluation to Human Understanding26 Mar 2026
- 2026xaitimesynth: A Python Package for Evaluating Attribution Methods for Time Series with Synthetic Ground Truth6 Mar 2026
- 2025Explainable time-series forecasting with sampling-free SHAP for Transformers23 Dec 2025
- 2025Why Do Class-Dependent Evaluation Effects Occur with Time Series Feature Attributions? A Synthetic Data Investigation13 Jun 2025
- 2025Class-Dependent Perturbation Effects in Evaluating Time Series Attributions24 Feb 2025
- 2025Adaptive Law-Based Transformation (ALT): A Lightweight Feature Representation for Time Series Classification16 Jan 2025
- 2025Explaining Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection in Energy Consumption Data by Focusing on Contextually Relevant Data10 Jan 2025
- 2024Finding the DeepDream for Time Series: Activation Maximization for Univariate Time Series20 Aug 2024
- 2024Time is Not Enough: Time-Frequency based Explanation for Time-Series Black-Box Models7 Aug 2024
- 2023Introducing the Attribution Stability Indicator: a Measure for Time Series XAI Attributions6 Oct 2023