mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Time to Focus: A Comprehensive Benchmark Using Time Series Attribution Methods

arXiv 2202.03759 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2022cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the last decade neural network have made huge impact both in industry and research due to their ability to extract meaningful features from imprecise or complex data, and by achieving super human performance in several domains. However, due to the lack of transparency the use of these networks is hampered in the areas with safety critical areas. In safety-critical areas, this is necessary by law. Recently several methods have been proposed to uncover this black box by providing interpreation of predictions made by these models. The paper focuses on time series analysis and benchmark several state-of-the-art attribution methods which compute explanations for convolutional classifiers. The presented experiments involve gradient-based and perturbation-based attribution methods. A detailed analysis shows that perturbation-based approaches are superior concerning the Sensitivity and occlusion game. These methods tend to produce explanations with higher continuity. Contrarily, the gradient-based techniques are superb in runtime and Infidelity. In addition, a validation the dependence of the methods on the trained model, feasible application domains, and individual characteristics is attached. The findings accentuate that choosing the best-suited attribution method is strongly correlated with the desired use case. Neither category of attribution methods nor a single approach has shown outstanding performance across all aspects.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.

Builds on

18 of 32 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  6. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  7. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  8. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
  9. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
  10. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  11. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 252
  12. 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
6 more
  1. 2021Sampling Permutations for Shapley Value Estimationcited by 101
  2. 2021Explaining Time Series Predictions with Dynamic Maskscited by 72
  3. 2021Robust Explainability: A Tutorial on Gradient-Based Attribution Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 48
  4. 2018TSViz: Demystification of Deep Learning Models for Time-Series Analysiscited by 25
  5. 2021How to choose an Explainability Method? Towards a Methodical Implementation of XAI in Practicecited by 9
  6. 2020Impact of Legal Requirements on Explainability in Machine Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

8 papers.