Explaining Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection in Energy Consumption Data by Focusing on Contextually Relevant Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting anomalies in energy consumption data is crucial for identifying energy waste, equipment malfunction, and overall, for ensuring efficient energy management. Machine learning, and specifically deep learning approaches, have been greatly successful in anomaly detection; however, they are black-box approaches that do not provide transparency or explanations. SHAP and its variants have been proposed to explain these models, but they suffer from high computational complexity (SHAP) or instability and inconsistency (e.g., Kernel SHAP). To address these challenges, this paper proposes an explainability approach for anomalies in energy consumption data that focuses on context-relevant information. The proposed approach leverages existing explainability techniques, focusing on SHAP variants, together with global feature importance and weighted cosine similarity to select background dataset based on the context of each anomaly point. By focusing on the context and most relevant features, this approach mitigates the instability of explainability algorithms. Experimental results across 10 different machine learning models, five datasets, and five XAI techniques, demonstrate that our method reduces the variability of explanations providing consistent explanations. Statistical analyses confirm the robustness of our approach, showing an average reduction in variability of approximately 38% across multiple datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2025.
Builds on
13 of 51 references.
References · 13
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 344
- 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 208
- 2022Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributionscited by 115
- 2019Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Seriescited by 67
- 2021Shapley values for feature selection: The good, the bad, and the axiomscited by 54
- 2021Utilizing XAI technique to improve autoencoder based model for computer network anomaly detection with shapley additive explanation(SHAP)cited by 15
- 2023A Deep Dive into Perturbations as Evaluation Technique for Time Series XAIcited by 11
- 2024On TinyML and Cybersecurity: Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Use Casecited by 9
- 2023Shaping Up SHAP: Enhancing Stability through Layer-Wise Neighbor Selectioncited by 7
- 2022Exploring Local Explanations of Nonlinear Models Using Animated Linear Projectionscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.