mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

xaitimesynth: A Python Package for Evaluating Attribution Methods for Time Series with Synthetic Ground Truth

arXiv 2603.06781 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating time series attribution methods is difficult because real-world datasets rarely provide ground truth for which time points drive a prediction. A common workaround is to generate synthetic data where class-discriminating features are placed at known locations, but each study currently reimplements this from scratch. We introduce xaitimesynth, a Python package that provides reusable infrastructure for this evaluation approach. The package generates synthetic time series following an additive model where each sample is a sum of background signal and a localized, class-discriminating feature, with the feature window automatically tracked as a ground truth mask. A fluent data generation API and YAML configuration format allow flexible and reproducible dataset definitions for both univariate and multivariate time series. The package also provides standard localization metrics, including AUC-PR, AUC-ROC, Relevance Mass Accuracy, and Relevance Rank Accuracy. xaitimesynth is open source and available at https://github.com/gregorbaer/xaitimesynth.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

19 of 28 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  2. 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 576
  3. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  4. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 321
  5. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
  6. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  7. 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
  8. 2020Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAIcited by 126
  9. 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
  10. 2022Evaluation of post-hoc interpretability methods in time-series classificationcited by 53
  11. 2024Decoupling Pixel Flipping and Occlusion Strategy for Consistent XAI Benchmarkscited by 28
  12. 2023Learning Perturbations to Explain Time Series Predictionscited by 23
7 more
  1. 2023A Deep Dive into Perturbations as Evaluation Technique for Time Series XAIcited by 11
  2. 2023Robust Explainer Recommendation for Time Series Classificationcited by 7
  3. 2025Evaluating Model Explanations without Ground Truthcited by 7
  4. 2024Improving the Evaluation and Actionability of Explanation Methods for Multivariate Time Series Classificationcited by 5
  5. 2025Class-Dependent Perturbation Effects in Evaluating Time Series Attributionscited by 5
  6. 2025Concept Extraction for Time Series with ECLAD-tscited by 2
  7. 2025Why Do Class-Dependent Evaluation Effects Occur with Time Series Feature Attributions? A Synthetic Data Investigationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.