mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Similitude and Robustness of Deep Image Denoising Models via Adversarial Attack

arXiv 2306.16050 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2023cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown superior performance comparing to traditional image denoising algorithms. However, DNNs are inevitably vulnerable while facing adversarial attacks. In this paper, we propose an adversarial attack method named denoising-PGD which can successfully attack all the current deep denoising models while keep the noise distribution almost unchanged. We surprisingly find that the current mainstream non-blind denoising models (DnCNN, FFDNet, ECNDNet, BRDNet), blind denoising models (DnCNN-B, Noise2Noise, RDDCNN-B, FAN), plug-and-play (DPIR, CurvPnP) and unfolding denoising models (DeamNet) almost share the same adversarial sample set on both grayscale and color images, respectively. Shared adversarial sample set indicates that all these models are similar in term of local behaviors at the neighborhood of all the test samples. Thus, we further propose an indicator to measure the local similarity of models, called robustness similitude. Non-blind denoising models are found to have high robustness similitude across each other, while hybrid-driven models are also found to have high robustness similitude with pure data-driven non-blind denoising models. According to our robustness assessment, data-driven non-blind denoising models are the most robust. We use adversarial training to complement the vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Moreover, the model-driven image denoising BM3D shows resistance on adversarial attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2023.

Builds on

47 of 70 references.

References · 47

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  7. 2021SwinIR: Image Restoration Using Swin Transformercited by 1,887
  8. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  9. 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,358
  10. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  11. 2021Uformer: A General U-Shaped Transformer for Image Restorationcited by 866
  12. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
35 more
  1. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
  2. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  3. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
  4. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  5. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 582
  6. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 536
  7. 2018Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Datacited by 533
  8. 2017FFDNet: Toward a Fast and Flexible Solution for CNN based Image Denoisingcited by 510
  9. 2020Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Deep Denoiser Priorcited by 470
  10. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 446
  11. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  12. 2017Learning Deep CNN Denoiser Prior for Image Restorationcited by 408
  13. 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 355
  14. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  15. 2022How Do Vision Transformers Work?cited by 307
  16. 2018Toward Convolutional Blind Denoising of Real Photographscited by 274
  17. 2020PIPAL: a Large-Scale Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Perceptual Image Restorationcited by 178
  18. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
  19. 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 158
  20. 2022Deep Generalized Unfolding Networks for Image Restorationcited by 121
  21. 2019Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and Removalcited by 117
  22. 2017Learning Proximal Operators: Using Denoising Networks for Regularizing Inverse Imaging Problemscited by 107
  23. 2022Practical Blind Image Denoising via Swin-Conv-UNet and Data Synthesiscited by 86
  24. 2016Medical image denoising using convolutional denoising autoencoderscited by 76
  25. 2020Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks -- Robustness Included?cited by 58
  26. 2023Masked Image Training for Generalizable Deep Image Denoisingcited by 57
  27. 2022SUNet: Swin Transformer UNet for Image Denoisingcited by 44
  28. 2022Towards Understanding and Boosting Adversarial Transferability from a Distribution Perspectivecited by 37
  29. 2017Regularizing deep networks using efficient layerwise adversarial trainingcited by 24
  30. 2020Pasadena: Perceptually Aware and Stealthy Adversarial Denoise Attackcited by 14
  31. 2022Towards Adversarially Robust Deep Image Denoisingcited by 13
  32. 2018Enhanced CNN for image denoisingcited by 6
  33. 2021Disrupting Adversarial Transferability in Deep Neural Networkscited by 6
  34. 2022CurvPnP: Plug-and-play Blind Image Restoration with Deep Curvature Denoisercited by 6
  35. 2021Evolving Architectures with Gradient Misalignment toward Low Adversarial Transferabilitycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

6 papers.