mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Disrupting Adversarial Transferability in Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2108.12492 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial attack transferability is well-recognized in deep learning. Prior work has partially explained transferability by recognizing common adversarial subspaces and correlations between decision boundaries, but little is known beyond this. We propose that transferability between seemingly different models is due to a high linear correlation between the feature sets that different networks extract. In other words, two models trained on the same task that are distant in the parameter space likely extract features in the same fashion, just with trivial affine transformations between the latent spaces. Furthermore, we show how applying a feature correlation loss, which decorrelates the extracted features in a latent space, can reduce the transferability of adversarial attacks between models, suggesting that the models complete tasks in semantically different ways. Finally, we propose a Dual Neck Autoencoder (DNA), which leverages this feature correlation loss to create two meaningfully different encodings of input information with reduced transferability.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2021.

Builds on

23 of 31 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  9. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  10. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  11. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  12. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
11 more
  1. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
  2. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
  3. 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 211
  4. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
  5. 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 156
  6. 2018Constructing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples with Generative Modelscited by 135
  7. 2020DVERGE: Diversifying Vulnerabilities for Enhanced Robust Generation of Ensemblescited by 73
  8. 2016Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 60
  9. 2020Universal Adversarial Perturbations: A Surveycited by 28
  10. 2017Generative Adversarial Trainer: Defense to Adversarial Perturbations with GANcited by 20
  11. 2018High Dimensional Spaces, Deep Learning and Adversarial Examplescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

6 papers.