mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evolving Architectures with Gradient Misalignment toward Low Adversarial Transferability

arXiv 2109.05919 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2021cs.CV cs.NEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural network image classifiers are known to be susceptible not only to adversarial examples created for them but even those created for others. This phenomenon poses a potential security risk in various black-box systems relying on image classifiers. The reason behind such transferability of adversarial examples is not yet fully understood and many studies have proposed training methods to obtain classifiers with low transferability. In this study, we address this problem from a novel perspective through investigating the contribution of the network architecture to transferability. Specifically, we propose an architecture searching framework that employs neuroevolution to evolve network architectures and the gradient misalignment loss to encourage networks to converge into dissimilar functions after training. Our experiments show that the proposed framework successfully discovers architectures that reduce transferability from four standard networks including ResNet and VGG, while maintaining a good accuracy on unperturbed images. In addition, the evolved networks trained with gradient misalignment exhibit significantly lower transferability compared to standard networks trained with gradient misalignment, which indicates that the network architecture plays an important role in reducing transferability. This study demonstrates that designing or exploring proper network architectures is a promising approach to tackle the transferability issue and train adversarially robust image classifiers.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2021.

Builds on

45 of 61 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  9. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  10. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  11. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  12. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
33 more
  1. 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,097
  2. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  3. 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
  4. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  5. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  6. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 778
  7. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  8. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  9. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  10. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  11. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 530
  12. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  13. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
  14. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
  15. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
  16. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
  17. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  18. 2020Skip Connections Matter: On the Transferability of Adversarial Examples Generated with ResNetscited by 165
  19. 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 156
  20. 2017Evolving Deep Neural Networkscited by 93
  21. 2019When NAS Meets Robustness: In Search of Robust Architectures against Adversarial Attackscited by 87
  22. 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness of Ensembles with Diversity Trainingcited by 69
  23. 2020Deep Learning COVID-19 Features on CXR using Limited Training Data Setscited by 68
  24. 2017A Genetic Programming Approach to Designing Convolutional Neural Network Architecturescited by 59
  25. 2018Automatically designing CNN architectures using genetic algorithm for image classificationcited by 48
  26. 2015A Unified Gradient Regularization Family for Adversarial Examplescited by 43
  27. 2020On Adversarial Robustness: A Neural Architecture Search perspectivecited by 22
  28. 2019Evolving Robust Neural Architectures to Defend from Adversarial Attackscited by 13
  29. 2021Multi-objective Search of Robust Neural Architectures against Multiple Types of Adversarial Attackscited by 11
  30. 2019Gradient Boosts the Approximate Vanishing Idealcited by 8
  31. 2020Orthogonal Deep Models As Defense Against Black-Box Attackscited by 7
  32. 2021Border basis computation with gradient-weighted normalizationcited by 5
  33. 2019Spectrum-Diverse Neuroevolution with Unified Neural Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.