mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pragmatic Inference with a CLIP Listener for Contrastive Captioning

arXiv 2306.08818 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2023cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a simple yet effective and robust method for contrastive captioning: generating discriminative captions that distinguish target images from very similar alternative distractor images. Our approach is built on a pragmatic inference procedure that formulates captioning as a reference game between a speaker, which produces possible captions describing the target, and a listener, which selects the target given the caption. Unlike previous methods that derive both speaker and listener distributions from a single captioning model, we leverage an off-the-shelf CLIP model to parameterize the listener. Compared with captioner-only pragmatic models, our method benefits from rich vision language alignment representations from CLIP when reasoning over distractors. Like previous methods for discriminative captioning, our method uses a hyperparameter to control the tradeoff between the informativity (how likely captions are to allow a human listener to discriminate the target image) and the fluency of the captions. However, we find that our method is substantially more robust to the value of this hyperparameter than past methods, which allows us to automatically optimize the captions for informativity - outperforming past methods for discriminative captioning by 11% to 15% accuracy in human evaluations

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2023.

Builds on

26 of 42 references.

References · 26

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  3. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  4. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  5. 2022Fine-grained Image Captioning with CLIP Rewardcited by 69
  6. 2016Reasoning About Pragmatics with Neural Listeners and Speakerscited by 68
  7. 2018Discriminability objective for training descriptive captionscited by 67
  8. 2020Multi-agent Communication meets Natural Language: Synergies between Functional and Structural Language Learningcited by 66
  9. 2017Colors in Context: A Pragmatic Neural Model for Grounded Language Understandingcited by 57
  10. 2017Unified Pragmatic Models for Generating and Following Instructionscited by 55
  11. 2017Comprehension-guided referring expressionscited by 52
  12. 2017Context-aware Captions from Context-agnostic Supervisioncited by 43
14 more
  1. 2018Pragmatically Informative Image Captioning with Character-Level Inferencecited by 42
  2. 2018Show, Tell and Discriminate: Image Captioning by Self-retrieval with Partially Labeled Datacited by 37
  3. 2019Pragmatically Informative Text Generationcited by 32
  4. 2020Compare and Reweight: Distinctive Image Captioning Using Similar Images Setscited by 27
  5. 2022Image Retrieval from Contextual Descriptionscited by 26
  6. 2018Video Storytelling: Textual Summaries for Eventscited by 22
  7. 2020Pragmatic Issue-Sensitive Image Captioningcited by 15
  8. 2021Reference-Centric Models for Grounded Collaborative Dialoguecited by 15
  9. 2021Group-based Distinctive Image Captioning with Memory Attentioncited by 13
  10. 2019Lost in Machine Translation: A Method to Reduce Meaning Losscited by 11
  11. 2022Rethinking the Reference-based Distinctive Image Captioningcited by 8
  12. 2019Communication-based Evaluation for Natural Language Generationcited by 5
  13. 2022Communication breakdown: On the low mutual intelligibility between human and neural captioningcited by 5
  14. 2022Switching to Discriminative Image Captioning by Relieving a Bottleneck of Reinforcement Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

4 papers.