mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Switching to Discriminative Image Captioning by Relieving a Bottleneck of Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2212.03230 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2022cs.CV cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Discriminativeness is a desirable feature of image captions: captions should describe the characteristic details of input images. However, recent high-performing captioning models, which are trained with reinforcement learning (RL), tend to generate overly generic captions despite their high performance in various other criteria. First, we investigate the cause of the unexpectedly low discriminativeness and show that RL has a deeply rooted side effect of limiting the output words to high-frequency words. The limited vocabulary is a severe bottleneck for discriminativeness as it is difficult for a model to describe the details beyond its vocabulary. Then, based on this identification of the bottleneck, we drastically recast discriminative image captioning as a much simpler task of encouraging low-frequency word generation. Hinted by long-tail classification and debiasing methods, we propose methods that easily switch off-the-shelf RL models to discriminativeness-aware models with only a single-epoch fine-tuning on the part of the parameters. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our methods significantly enhance the discriminativeness of off-the-shelf RL models and even outperform previous discriminativeness-aware methods with much smaller computational costs. Detailed analysis and human evaluation also verify that our methods boost the discriminativeness without sacrificing the overall quality of captions.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 69 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2022.

Builds on

69 of 90 references.

References · 69

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  6. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  8. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  9. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
  10. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  11. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  12. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
38 more
  1. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  2. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  3. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  4. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
  5. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  6. 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 806
  7. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 779
  8. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 749
  9. 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 742
  10. 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 605
  11. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
  12. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
  13. 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
  14. 2021Deep Long-Tailed Learning: A Surveycited by 416
  15. 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generationcited by 286
  16. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
  17. 2020Long-tailed Recognition by Routing Diverse Distribution-Aware Expertscited by 270
  18. 2020Long-Tailed Classification by Keeping the Good and Removing the Bad Momentum Causal Effectcited by 256
  19. 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Modelscited by 236
  20. 2019Dice Loss for Data-imbalanced NLP Taskscited by 180
  21. 2019Unlearn Dataset Bias in Natural Language Inference by Fitting the Residualcited by 119
  22. 2020Captioning Images Taken by People Who Are Blindcited by 108
  23. 2021Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioningcited by 108
  24. 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
  25. 2018A Study of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 74
  26. 2018Multi-Reward Reinforced Summarization with Saliency and Entailmentcited by 73
  27. 2022Fine-grained Image Captioning with CLIP Rewardcited by 69
  28. 2016Reasoning About Pragmatics with Neural Listeners and Speakerscited by 68
  29. 2018Discriminability objective for training descriptive captionscited by 67
  30. 2017Towards Diverse and Natural Image Descriptions via a Conditional GANcited by 59
  31. 2019TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluationcited by 58
  32. 2017Colors in Context: A Pragmatic Neural Model for Grounded Language Understandingcited by 57
  33. 2022GRIT: Faster and Better Image captioning Transformer Using Dual Visual Featurescited by 56
  34. 2017Classical Structured Prediction Losses for Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 55
  35. 2017Contrastive Learning for Image Captioningcited by 54
  36. 2019Describing like humans: on diversity in image captioningcited by 46
  37. 2017Context-aware Captions from Context-agnostic Supervisioncited by 43
  38. 2018Pragmatically Informative Image Captioning with Character-Level Inferencecited by 42

50 most cited of 69 All 69 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

4 papers.