Lost in Machine Translation: A Method to Reduce Meaning Loss
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A desideratum of high-quality translation systems is that they preserve meaning, in the sense that two sentences with different meanings should not translate to one and the same sentence in another language. However, state-of-the-art systems often fail in this regard, particularly in cases where the source and target languages partition the "meaning space" in different ways. For instance, "I cut my finger." and "I cut my finger off." describe different states of the world but are translated to French (by both Fairseq and Google Translate) as "Je me suis coupe le doigt.", which is ambiguous as to whether the finger is detached. More generally, translation systems are typically many-to-one (non-injective) functions from source to target language, which in many cases results in important distinctions in meaning being lost in translation. Building on Bayesian models of informative utterance production, we present a method to define a less ambiguous translation system in terms of an underlying pre-trained neural sequence-to-sequence model. This method increases injectivity, resulting in greater preservation of meaning as measured by improvement in cycle-consistency, without impeding translation quality (measured by BLEU score).
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.
11 papers.
- 2021Perspective-taking and Pragmatics for Generating Empathetic Responses Focused on Emotion Causescited by 43
- 2022Pragmatics in Language Grounding: Phenomena, Tasks, and Modeling Approachescited by 12
- 2024RSA-Control: A Pragmatics-Grounded Lightweight Controllable Text Generation Frameworkcited by 11
- 2021A practical introduction to the Rational Speech Act modeling frameworkcited by 6
- 2024GLIMPSE: Pragmatically Informative Multi-Document Summarization for Scholarly Reviewscited by 6
- 2023Generating Pragmatic Examples to Train Neural Program Synthesizerscited by 5
- 2023Pragmatic Inference with a CLIP Listener for Contrastive Captioningcited by 4
- 2025NeoBabel: A Multilingual Open Tower for Visual Generationcited by 2
- 2025Collaborative Rational Speech Act: Pragmatic Reasoning for Multi-Turn Dialogcited by 2
- 2025Rational Retrieval Acts: Leveraging Pragmatic Reasoning to Improve Sparse Retrievalcited by 1
- 2025(RSA)2: A Rhetorical-Strategy-Aware Rational Speech Act Framework for Figurative Language Understandingcited by 0
- 2025Collaborative Rational Speech Act: Pragmatic Reasoning for Multi-Turn Dialog18 Jul 2025
- 2025NeoBabel: A Multilingual Open Tower for Visual Generation8 Jul 2025
- 2025(RSA)2: A Rhetorical-Strategy-Aware Rational Speech Act Framework for Figurative Language Understanding10 Jun 2025
- 2025Rational Retrieval Acts: Leveraging Pragmatic Reasoning to Improve Sparse Retrieval6 May 2025
- 2024RSA-Control: A Pragmatics-Grounded Lightweight Controllable Text Generation Framework24 Oct 2024
- 2024GLIMPSE: Pragmatically Informative Multi-Document Summarization for Scholarly Reviews11 Jun 2024
- 2023Generating Pragmatic Examples to Train Neural Program Synthesizers9 Nov 2023
- 2023Pragmatic Inference with a CLIP Listener for Contrastive Captioning15 Jun 2023
- 2022Pragmatics in Language Grounding: Phenomena, Tasks, and Modeling Approaches15 Nov 2022
- 2021Perspective-taking and Pragmatics for Generating Empathetic Responses Focused on Emotion Causes18 Sep 2021
- 2021A practical introduction to the Rational Speech Act modeling framework20 May 2021