mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pruning the Way to Reliable Policies: A Multi-Objective Deep Q-Learning Approach to Critical Care

arXiv 2306.08044 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Medical treatments often involve a sequence of decisions, each informed by previous outcomes. This process closely aligns with reinforcement learning (RL), a framework for optimizing sequential decisions to maximize cumulative rewards under unknown dynamics. While RL shows promise for creating data-driven treatment plans, its application in medical contexts is challenging due to the frequent need to use sparse rewards, primarily defined based on mortality outcomes. This sparsity can reduce the stability of offline estimates, posing a significant hurdle in fully utilizing RL for medical decision-making. We introduce a deep Q-learning approach to obtain more reliable critical care policies by integrating relevant but noisy frequently measured biomarker signals into the reward specification without compromising the optimization of the main outcome. Our method prunes the action space based on all available rewards before training a final model on the sparse main reward. This approach minimizes potential distortions of the main objective while extracting valuable information from intermediate signals to guide learning. We evaluate our method in off-policy and offline settings using simulated environments and real health records from intensive care units. Our empirical results demonstrate that our method outperforms common offline RL methods such as conservative Q-learning and batch-constrained deep Q-learning. By disentangling sparse rewards and frequently measured reward proxies through action pruning, our work represents a step towards developing reliable policies that effectively harness the wealth of available information in data-intensive critical care environments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2023.

Builds on

24 of 60 references.

References · 24

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  3. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  4. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  5. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 240
  6. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
  7. 2019Counterfactual Off-Policy Evaluation with Gumbel-Max Structural Causal Modelscited by 114
  8. 2019Benchmarking Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 108
  9. 2016Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
  10. 2017Continuous State-Space Models for Optimal Sepsis Treatment - a Deep Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 68
  11. 2021Model Selection for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Practical Considerations for Healthcare Settingscited by 68
  12. 2018Evaluating Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Observational Health Settingscited by 60
12 more
  1. 2017A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation in Intensive Care Unitscited by 50
  2. 2023Leveraging Factored Action Spaces for Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning in Healthcarecited by 41
  3. 2019Improving Sepsis Treatment Strategies by Combining Deep and Kernel-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
  4. 2019Off-Policy Evaluation via Off-Policy Classificationcited by 32
  5. 2021Medical Dead-ends and Learning to Identify High-risk States and Treatmentscited by 28
  6. 2020Clinician-in-the-Loop Decision Making: Reinforcement Learning with Near-Optimal Set-Valued Policiescited by 24
  7. 2018Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Sepsis Treatmentcited by 21
  8. 2017An Improved Multi-Output Gaussian Process RNN with Real-Time Validation for Early Sepsis Detectioncited by 16
  9. 2021Unifying Cardiovascular Modelling with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Uncertainty Aware Control of Sepsis Treatmentcited by 16
  10. 2014Non-Deterministic Policies in Markovian Decision Processescited by 7
  11. 2018An Optimal Policy for Patient Laboratory Tests in Intensive Care Unitscited by 7
  12. 2023Risk Sensitive Dead-end Identification in Safety-Critical Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Benchmarking Offline Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning in Critical Care
  2. 2022Towards Safe Mechanical Ventilation Treatment Using Deep Offline Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2023Deep Offline Reinforcement Learning for Real-world Treatment Optimization Applications
  4. 2022A Conservative Q-Learning approach for handling distribution shift in sepsis treatment strategies
  5. 2022Learning Optimal Treatment Strategies for Sepsis Using Offline Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Space
  6. 2022Predicting the Need for Blood Transfusion in Intensive Care Units with Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2024Offline Inverse Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Safe-Critical Decision Making in Healthcare
  8. 2025DeepEN: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Personalized Enteral Nutrition in Critical Care