mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Explainable Conversational Recommender Systems

arXiv 2305.18363 ↗First posted 27 May 2023cs.IR cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explanations in conventional recommender systems have demonstrated benefits in helping the user understand the rationality of the recommendations and improving the system's efficiency, transparency, and trustworthiness. In the conversational environment, multiple contextualized explanations need to be generated, which poses further challenges for explanations. To better measure explainability in conversational recommender systems (CRS), we propose ten evaluation perspectives based on concepts from conventional recommender systems together with the characteristics of CRS. We assess five existing CRS benchmark datasets using these metrics and observe the necessity of improving the explanation quality of CRS. To achieve this, we conduct manual and automatic approaches to extend these dialogues and construct a new CRS dataset, namely Explainable Recommendation Dialogues (E-ReDial). It includes 756 dialogues with over 2,000 high-quality rewritten explanations. We compare two baseline approaches to perform explanation generation based on E-ReDial. Experimental results suggest that models trained on E-ReDial can significantly improve explainability while introducing knowledge into the models can further improve the performance. GPT-3 in the in-context learning setting can generate more realistic and diverse movie descriptions. In contrast, T5 training on E-ReDial can better generate clear reasons for recommendations based on user preferences. E-ReDial is available at https://github.com/Superbooming/E-ReDial.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2023.

Builds on

23 of 47 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  3. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  4. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  5. 2018Towards Deep Conversational Recommendationscited by 176
  6. 2020A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 143
  7. 2020Improving Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge Graph based Semantic Fusioncited by 122
  8. 2021Advances and Challenges in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 118
  9. 2019Towards Knowledge-Based Recommender Dialog Systemcited by 113
  10. 2020Towards Conversational Recommendation over Multi-Type Dialogscited by 107
  11. 2020Towards Topic-Guided Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 94
  12. 2020INSPIRED: Toward Sociable Recommendation Dialog Systemscited by 93
11 more
  1. 2021Counterfactual Explainable Recommendationcited by 60
  2. 2017Neural Rating Regression with Abstractive Tips Generation for Recommendationcited by 50
  3. 2021Simulating User Satisfaction for the Evaluation of Task-oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 47
  4. 2021RevCore: Review-augmented Conversational Recommendationcited by 47
  5. 2021Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Recommenderscited by 27
  6. 2020Analysis of Q-learning with Adaptation and Momentum Restart for Gradient Descentcited by 26
  7. 2020Neural Interactive Collaborative Filteringcited by 24
  8. 2022Measuring "Why" in Recommender Systems: a Comprehensive Survey on the Evaluation of Explainable Recommendationcited by 14
  9. 2013Do Social Explanations Work? Studying and Modeling the Effects of Social Explanations in Recommender Systemscited by 10
  10. 2021EXTRA: Explanation Ranking Datasets for Explainable Recommendationcited by 9
  11. 2022EGCR: Explanation Generation for Conversational Recommendationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.