mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Achieving the Asymptotically Optimal Sample Complexity of Offline Reinforcement Learning: A DRO-Based Approach

arXiv 2305.13289 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Offline RL algorithms

Abstract (arXiv)

Offline reinforcement learning aims to learn from pre-collected datasets without active exploration. This problem faces significant challenges, including limited data availability and distributional shifts. Existing approaches adopt a pessimistic stance towards uncertainty by penalizing rewards of under-explored state-action pairs to estimate value functions conservatively. In this paper, we show that the distributionally robust optimization (DRO) based approach can also address these challenges and is asymptotically minimax optimal. Specifically, we directly model the uncertainty in the transition kernel and construct an uncertainty set of statistically plausible transition kernels. We then show that the policy that optimizes the worst-case performance over this uncertainty set has a near-optimal performance in the underlying problem. We first design a metric-based distribution-based uncertainty set such that with high probability the true transition kernel is in this set. We prove that to achieve a sub-optimality gap of ε, the sample complexity is O(S2Cπ^*ε-2(1-γ)-4), where γ is the discount factor, S is the number of states, and Cπ^* is the single-policy clipped concentrability coefficient which quantifies the distribution shift. To achieve the optimal sample complexity, we further propose a less conservative value-function-based uncertainty set, which, however, does not necessarily include the true transition kernel. We show that an improved sample complexity of O(SCπ^*ε-2(1-γ)-3) can be obtained, which asymptotically matches with the minimax lower bound for offline reinforcement learning, and thus is asymptotically minimax optimal.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 60 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

60 of 86 references.

Closest ancestors · 30

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Double Pessimism is Provably Efficient for Distributionally Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning: Generic Algorithm and Robust Partial Coverage16 May
  2. 2023Adversarial Model for Offline Reinforcement Learning21 Feb
  3. 2022Optimal Conservative Offline RL with General Function Approximation via Augmented Lagrangian1 Nov
  4. 2022Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism-Modulated Dynamics Belief13 Oct
  5. 2022Distributionally Robust Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity11 Aug
  6. 2022RAMBO-RL: Robust Adversarial Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning26 Apr
  7. 2022Settling the Sample Complexity of Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning11 Apr
  8. 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning Under Value and Density-Ratio Realizability: The Power of Gaps25 Mar
  9. 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexity28 Feb
  10. 2021Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism17 Oct
  11. 2021Provable Benefits of Actor-Critic Methods for Offline Reinforcement Learning19 Aug
  12. 2021Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial Coverage13 Jul
18 more
  1. 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learning13 Jun
  2. 2021Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning9 Jun
  3. 2021Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of Pessimism22 Mar
  4. 2021COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization16 Feb
  5. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?30 Dec
  6. 2020Batch Value-function Approximation with Only Realizability11 Aug
  7. 2020EMaQ: Expected-Max Q-Learning Operator for Simple Yet Effective Offline and Online RL21 Jul
  8. 2020Provably Good Batch Reinforcement Learning Without Great Exploration16 Jul
  9. 2020Critic Regularized Regression26 Jun
  10. 2020RL Unplugged: A Suite of Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning24 Jun
  11. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning8 Jun
  12. 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimization27 May
  13. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning12 May
  14. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems4 May
  15. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning15 Apr
  16. 2020Keep Doing What Worked: Behavioral Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement Learning19 Feb
  17. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learning26 Nov
  18. 2019Benchmarking Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms3 Oct

Other references · 30

  1. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
  2. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
  3. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  4. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  5. 2019Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 308
  6. 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
  7. 2019Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialogcited by 283
  8. 2019AlgaeDICE: Policy Gradient from Arbitrary Experiencecited by 187
  9. 2019Neural Policy Gradient Methods: Global Optimality and Rates of Convergencecited by 157
  10. 2019Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 150
  11. 2017Safe Policy Improvement with Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 141
  12. 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimalcited by 124
18 more
  1. 2020Minimax-Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation with Linear Function Approximationcited by 120
  2. 2020Variational Policy Gradient Method for Reinforcement Learning with General Utilitiescited by 108
  3. 2020The Importance of Pessimism in Fixed-Dataset Policy Optimizationcited by 99
  4. 2022Robust Reinforcement Learning using Offline Datacited by 95
  5. 2021Sample Complexity of Robust Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 82
  6. 2020GradientDICE: Rethinking Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Valuescited by 70
  7. 2020Batch Policy Learning in Average Reward Markov Decision Processescited by 69
  8. 2020On Linear Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for Finite MDPscited by 51
  9. 2023Improved Sample Complexity Bounds for Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
  10. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPscited by 42
  11. 2022Pessimistic Minimax Value Iteration: Provably Efficient Equilibrium Learning from Offline Datasetscited by 42
  12. 2022The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learningcited by 41
  13. 2014Approximate Policy Iteration Schemes: A Comparisoncited by 39
  14. 2021Towards Theoretical Understandings of Robust Markov Decision Processes: Sample Complexity and Asymptoticscited by 27
  15. 2022When is Offline Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Game Solvable?cited by 27
  16. 2021Mitigating Covariate Shift in Imitation Learning via Offline Data Without Great Coveragecited by 26
  17. 2019On Value Functions and the Agent-Environment Boundarycited by 19
  18. 2023Near-Optimal Degree Testing for Bayes Netscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Minimax Optimal and Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Distributionally Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2021DROMO: Distributionally Robust Offline Model-based Policy Optimization
  3. 2024Sample Complexity of Offline Distributionally Robust Linear Markov Decision Processes
  4. 2024On Sample-Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning: Data Diversity, Posterior Sampling, and Beyond
  5. 2023Bridging Distributionally Robust Learning and Offline RL: An Approach to Mitigate Distribution Shift and Partial Data Coverage
  6. 2023Offline Reinforcement Learning with Additional Covering Distributions
  7. 2025Towards Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2023Selective Uncertainty Propagation in Offline RL