mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EMaQ: Expected-Max Q-Learning Operator for Simple Yet Effective Offline and Online RL

arXiv 2007.11091 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 113

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Offline RL algorithms

Abstract (arXiv)

Off-policy reinforcement learning holds the promise of sample-efficient learning of decision-making policies by leveraging past experience. However, in the offline RL setting -- where a fixed collection of interactions are provided and no further interactions are allowed -- it has been shown that standard off-policy RL methods can significantly underperform. Recently proposed methods often aim to address this shortcoming by constraining learned policies to remain close to the given dataset of interactions. In this work, we closely investigate an important simplification of BCQ -- a prior approach for offline RL -- which removes a heuristic design choice and naturally restricts extracted policies to remain exactly within the support of a given behavior policy. Importantly, in contrast to their original theoretical considerations, we derive this simplified algorithm through the introduction of a novel backup operator, Expected-Max Q-Learning (EMaQ), which is more closely related to the resulting practical algorithm. Specifically, in addition to the distribution support, EMaQ explicitly considers the number of samples and the proposal distribution, allowing us to derive new sub-optimality bounds which can serve as a novel measure of complexity for offline RL problems. In the offline RL setting -- the main focus of this work -- EMaQ matches and outperforms prior state-of-the-art in the D4RL benchmarks. In the online RL setting, we demonstrate that EMaQ is competitive with Soft Actor Critic. The key contributions of our empirical findings are demonstrating the importance of careful generative model design for estimating behavior policies, and an intuitive notion of complexity for offline RL problems. With its simple interpretation and fewer moving parts, such as no explicit function approximator representing the policy, EMaQ serves as a strong yet easy to implement baseline for future work.

Key facts. Cited by 113 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2020: 3; 2021: 20; 2022: 32; 2023: 21; 2024: 12; 2025: 10; 2026: 15.

113 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  2. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
  3. 2021What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulationcited by 699
  4. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling Problemcited by 636
  5. 2021COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 365
  6. 2023IDQL: Implicit Q-Learning as an Actor-Critic Method with Diffusion Policiescited by 307
  7. 2021Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of Pessimismcited by 275
  8. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularizationcited by 237
  9. 2023Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuningcited by 230
  10. 2021Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via Balanced Replay and Pessimistic Q-Ensemblecited by 211
  11. 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning via High-Fidelity Generative Behavior Modelingcited by 177
  12. 2020OPAL: Offline Primitive Discovery for Accelerating Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 164
38 more
  1. 2021Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial Coveragecited by 160
  2. 2022Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learningcited by 137
  3. 2023HIQL: Offline Goal-Conditioned RL with Latent States as Actionscited by 133
  4. 2022Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 125
  5. 2022Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 112
  6. 2021Generalized Decision Transformer for Offline Hindsight Information Matchingcited by 105
  7. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Action Chunkingcited by 97
  8. 2020Human-centric Dialog Training via Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
  9. 2024Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?cited by 82
  10. 2022Can Wikipedia Help Offline Reinforcement Learning?cited by 76
  11. 2022Why So Pessimistic? Estimating Uncertainties for Offline RL through Ensembles, and Why Their Independence Matterscited by 74
  12. 2022Supported Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 73
  13. 2024Policy Agnostic RL: Offline RL and Online RL Fine-Tuning of Any Class and Backbonecited by 71
  14. 2022How to Leverage Unlabeled Data in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 61
  15. 2022Offline RL Policies Should be Trained to be Adaptivecited by 52
  16. 2022VRL3: A Data-Driven Framework for Visual Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 51
  17. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning as Anti-Explorationcited by 44
  18. 2024Diffusion Policies creating a Trust Region for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
  19. 2022DARA: Dynamics-Aware Reward Augmentation in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  20. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Episodic Memorycited by 36
  21. 2022CHAI: A CHatbot AI for Task-Oriented Dialogue with Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
  22. 2023The In-Sample Softmax for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
  23. 2023Reasoning with Latent Diffusion in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
  24. 2021Regularized Behavior Value Estimationcited by 32
  25. 2021Model-Based Offline Planning with Trajectory Pruningcited by 30
  26. 2025EXPO: Stable Reinforcement Learning with Expressive Policiescited by 30
  27. 2022Optimal Conservative Offline RL with General Function Approximation via Augmented Lagrangiancited by 29
  28. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Soft Behavior Regularizationcited by 28
  29. 2021Continuous Doubly Constrained Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
  30. 2022Semi-Supervised Offline Reinforcement Learning with Action-Free Trajectoriescited by 27
  31. 2023Beyond OOD State Actions: Supported Cross-Domain Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
  32. 2023DiffCPS: Diffusion Model based Constrained Policy Search for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
  33. 2025Scaling Offline RL via Efficient and Expressive Shortcut Modelscited by 27
  34. 2022Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism-Modulated Dynamics Beliefcited by 22
  35. 2023Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning from Low Quality Datacited by 21
  36. 2024Doubly Mild Generalization for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  37. 2024Offline Reinforcement Learning with OOD State Correction and OOD Action Suppressioncited by 17
  38. 2022On the Role of Discount Factor in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 16

50 most cited of 113 All 113 (JSON)

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2023Projected Off-Policy Q-Learning (POP-QL) for Stabilizing Offline Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2021Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-Ensemble
  5. 2022Oracle Inequalities for Model Selection in Offline Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2024Exclusively Penalized Q-learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2024ACL-QL: Adaptive Conservative Level in Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2025Pretraining a Shared Q-Network for Data-Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning