mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exact Recovery for System Identification with More Corrupt Data than Clean Data

arXiv 2305.10506 ↗First posted 17 May 2023cs.LG math.OCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates the system identification problem for linear discrete-time systems under adversaries and analyzes two lasso-type estimators. We examine both asymptotic and non-asymptotic properties of these estimators in two separate scenarios, corresponding to deterministic and stochastic models for the attack times. Since the samples collected from the system are correlated, the existing results on lasso are not applicable. We prove that when the system is stable and attacks are injected periodically, the sample complexity for exact recovery of the system dynamics is linear in terms of the dimension of the states. When adversarial attacks occur at each time instance with probability p, the required sample complexity for exact recovery scales polynomially in the dimension of the states and the probability p. This result implies almost sure convergence to the true system dynamics under the asymptotic regime. As a by-product, our estimators still learn the system correctly even when more than half of the data is compromised. We highlight that the attack vectors are allowed to be correlated with each other in this work, whereas we make some assumptions about the times at which the attacks happen. This paper provides the first mathematical guarantee in the literature on learning from correlated data for dynamical systems in the case when there is less clean data than corrupt data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2023.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 159
  2. 2018Learning Without Mixing: Towards A Sharp Analysis of Linear System Identificationcited by 158
  3. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 116
  4. 2022Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspectivecited by 53
  5. 2014Learning without Concentrationcited by 50
  6. 2018Spectral Filtering for General Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 37
  7. 2017Safe Learning of Quadrotor Dynamics Using Barrier Certificatescited by 35
  8. 2020Active Learning for Identification of Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 33
  9. 2020Finite-time Identification of Stable Linear Systems: Optimality of the Least-Squares Estimatorcited by 26
  10. 2020Bridging Convex and Nonconvex Optimization in Robust PCA: Noise, Outliers, and Missing Datacited by 23
  11. 2021On the Regret Analysis of Online LQR Control with Predictionscited by 22
  12. 2019Learning Sparse Dynamical Systems from a Single Sample Trajectorycited by 20
7 more
  1. 2020Online Robust Regression via SGD on the l1 losscited by 20
  2. 2022Control Barrier Functions and Input-to-State Safety with Application to Automated Vehiclescited by 13
  3. 2019Nonparametric Finite Time LTI System Identificationcited by 11
  4. 2021Safe Adaptive Learning-based Control for Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulators with Regret Guaranteescited by 11
  5. 2022Learning of Dynamical Systems under Adversarial Attacks -- Null Space Property Perspectivecited by 3
  6. 2014Analysis of A Nonsmooth Optimization Approach to Robust Estimationcited by 2
  7. 2017On a class of optimization-based robust estimatorscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.