mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exact Recovery Guarantees for Parameterized Nonlinear System Identification Problem under Sparse Disturbances or Semi-Oblivious Attacks

arXiv 2409.00276 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2024math.OC cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we study the problem of learning a nonlinear dynamical system by parameterizing its dynamics using basis functions. We assume that disturbances occur at each time step with an arbitrary probability p, which models the sparsity level of the disturbance vectors over time. These disturbances are drawn from an arbitrary, unknown probability distribution, which may depend on past disturbances, provided that it satisfies a zero-mean assumption. The primary objective of this paper is to learn the system's dynamics within a finite time and analyze the sample complexity as a function of p. To achieve this, we examine a LASSO-type non-smooth estimator, and establish necessary and sufficient conditions for its well-specifiedness and the uniqueness of the global solution to the underlying optimization problem. We then provide exact recovery guarantees for the estimator under two distinct conditions: boundedness and Lipschitz continuity of the basis functions. We show that finite-time exact recovery is achieved with high probability, even when p approaches 1. Unlike prior works, which primarily focus on independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) disturbances and provide only asymptotic guarantees for system learning, this study presents the first finite-time analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems under a highly general disturbance model. Our framework allows for possible temporal correlations in the disturbances and accommodates semi-oblivious adversarial attacks, significantly broadening the scope of existing theoretical results.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2024.

Builds on

17 of 36 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Learning Without Mixing: Towards A Sharp Analysis of Linear System Identificationcited by 158
  2. 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 151
  3. 2019Finite Sample Analysis of Stochastic System Identificationcited by 67
  4. 2017Finite Time Identification in Unstable Linear Systemscited by 66
  5. 2022Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspectivecited by 52
  6. 2020Learning nonlinear dynamical systems from a single trajectorycited by 46
  7. 2021CROP: Certifying Robust Policies for Reinforcement Learning through Functional Smoothingcited by 41
  8. 2020Non-asymptotic and Accurate Learning of Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 39
  9. 2021Policy Smoothing for Provably Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 39
  10. 2018Safely Learning to Control the Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 31
  11. 2022Single Trajectory Nonparametric Learning of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 26
  12. 2020Bridging Convex and Nonconvex Optimization in Robust PCA: Noise, Outliers, and Missing Datacited by 23
5 more
  1. 2017Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimizationcited by 5
  2. 2022Learning of Dynamical Systems under Adversarial Attacks -- Null Space Property Perspectivecited by 3
  3. 2014Analysis of A Nonsmooth Optimization Approach to Robust Estimationcited by 2
  4. 2017On a class of optimization-based robust estimatorscited by 2
  5. 2023Exact Recovery for System Identification with More Corrupt Data than Clean Datacited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.