mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Latent Distribution Adjusting for Face Anti-Spoofing

arXiv 2305.09285 ↗First posted 16 May 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the development of deep learning, the field of face anti-spoofing (FAS) has witnessed great progress. FAS is usually considered a classification problem, where each class is assumed to contain a single cluster optimized by softmax loss. In practical deployment, one class can contain several local clusters, and a single-center is insufficient to capture the inherent structure of the FAS data. However, few approaches consider large distribution discrepancies in the field of FAS. In this work, we propose a unified framework called Latent Distribution Adjusting (LDA) with properties of latent, discriminative, adaptive, generic to improve the robustness of the FAS model by adjusting complex data distribution with multiple prototypes. 1) Latent. LDA attempts to model the data of each class as a Gaussian mixture distribution, and acquire a flexible number of centers for each class in the last fully connected layer implicitly. 2) Discriminative. To enhance the intra-class compactness and inter-class discrepancy, we propose a margin-based loss for providing distribution constrains for prototype learning. 3) Adaptive. To make LDA more efficient and decrease redundant parameters, we propose Adaptive Prototype Selection (APS) by selecting the appropriate number of centers adaptively according to different distributions. 4) Generic. Furthermore, LDA can adapt to unseen distribution by utilizing very few training data without re-training. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework can 1) make the final representation space both intra-class compact and inter-class separable, 2) outperform the state-of-the-art methods on multiple standard FAS benchmarks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2023.

Builds on

20 of 46 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  3. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 733
  4. 2019PANet: Few-Shot Image Semantic Segmentation with Prototype Alignmentcited by 449
  5. 2018Additive Margin Softmax for Face Verificationcited by 275
  6. 2020Semantic Drift Compensation for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 241
  7. 2020Searching Central Difference Convolutional Networks for Face Anti-Spoofingcited by 173
  8. 2018Learning Deep Models for Face Anti-Spoofing: Binary or Auxiliary Supervisioncited by 167
  9. 2020Single-Side Domain Generalization for Face Anti-Spoofingcited by 139
  10. 2018Robust Classification with Convolutional Prototype Learningcited by 122
  11. 2020CelebA-Spoof: Large-Scale Face Anti-Spoofing Dataset with Rich Annotationscited by 109
  12. 2017L2-constrained Softmax Loss for Discriminative Face Verificationcited by 96
8 more
  1. 2019Hyperspherical Prototype Networkscited by 85
  2. 2015face anti-spoofing based on color texture analysiscited by 82
  3. 2014Learn Convolutional Neural Network for Face Anti-Spoofingcited by 80
  4. 2020Deep Spatial Gradient and Temporal Depth Learning for Face Anti-spoofingcited by 70
  5. 2020Face Anti-Spoofing with Human Material Perceptioncited by 62
  6. 2018Face De-Spoofing: Anti-Spoofing via Noise Modelingcited by 60
  7. 2018ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 56
  8. 2019Hierarchical Prototype Learning for Zero-Shot Recognitioncited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.