Local Optimization Achieves Global Optimality in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Policy optimization methods with function approximation are widely used in multi-agent reinforcement learning. However, it remains elusive how to design such algorithms with statistical guarantees. Leveraging a multi-agent performance difference lemma that characterizes the landscape of multi-agent policy optimization, we find that the localized action value function serves as an ideal descent direction for each local policy. Motivated by the observation, we present a multi-agent PPO algorithm in which the local policy of each agent is updated similarly to vanilla PPO. We prove that with standard regularity conditions on the Markov game and problem-dependent quantities, our algorithm converges to the globally optimal policy at a sublinear rate. We extend our algorithm to the off-policy setting and introduce pessimism to policy evaluation, which aligns with experiments. To our knowledge, this is the first provably convergent multi-agent PPO algorithm in cooperative Markov games.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2023.
Builds on
39 of 68 references.
References · 39
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
- 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Datacited by 452
- 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 362
- 2016Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Controlcited by 361
- 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
27 more
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
- 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 281
- 2021Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of Pessimismcited by 275
- 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
- 2020Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Taskscited by 207
- 2018Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 202
- 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
- 2019On the Theory of Policy Gradient Methods: Optimality, Approximation, and Distribution Shiftcited by 174
- 2019Is a Good Representation Sufficient for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning?cited by 140
- 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning with Realizability and Single-policy Concentrabilitycited by 122
- 2019Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization: Global Convergence and Faster Rates for Regularized MDPscited by 113
- 2020Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 108
- 2021Independent Policy Gradient Methods for Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 97
- 2021Global Convergence of Multi-Agent Policy Gradient in Markov Potential Gamescited by 89
- 2019Probabilistic Recursive Reasoning for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2021Fast Policy Extragradient Methods for Competitive Games with Entropy Regularizationcited by 61
- 2020Predictive Information Accelerates Learning in RLcited by 56
- 2021Tactical Optimism and Pessimism for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
- 2022Independent Policy Gradient for Large-Scale Markov Potential Games: Sharper Rates, Function Approximation, and Game-Agnostic Convergencecited by 54
- 2019Bi-level Actor-Critic for Multi-agent Coordinationcited by 38
- 2019ELF OpenGo: An Analysis and Open Reimplementation of AlphaZerocited by 37
- 2021Independent Natural Policy Gradient Always Converges in Markov Potential Gamescited by 34
- 2022Faster Last-iterate Convergence of Policy Optimization in Zero-Sum Markov Gamescited by 25
- 2018Near-Optimal Time and Sample Complexities for Solving Discounted Markov Decision Process with a Generative Modelcited by 22
- 2021Provably Efficient Policy Optimization for Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Gamescited by 18
- 2016Deep Learning for Reward Design to Improve Monte Carlo Tree Search in ATARI Gamescited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024On Sample-Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning: Data Diversity, Posterior Sampling, and Beyondcited by 6
- 2024Toward Finding Strong Pareto Optimal Policies in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2025K-Level Policy Gradients for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Low Variance Trust Region Optimization with Independent Actors and Sequential Updates in Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Low Variance Trust Region Optimization with Independent Actors and Sequential Updates in Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning24 Jun 2026
- 2025K-Level Policy Gradients for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning15 Sep 2025
- 2024Toward Finding Strong Pareto Optimal Policies in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning25 Oct 2024
- 2024On Sample-Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning: Data Diversity, Posterior Sampling, and Beyond6 Jan 2024