mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Regularizing Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via Structural Constraints

arXiv 2305.00131 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-training based on pseudo-labels has emerged as a dominant approach for addressing conditional distribution shifts in unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) for semantic segmentation problems. A notable drawback, however, is that this family of approaches is susceptible to erroneous pseudo labels that arise from confirmation biases in the source domain and that manifest as nuisance factors in the target domain. A possible source for this mismatch is the reliance on only photometric cues provided by RGB image inputs, which may ultimately lead to sub-optimal adaptation. To mitigate the effect of mismatched pseudo-labels, we propose to incorporate structural cues from auxiliary modalities, such as depth, to regularise conventional self-training objectives. Specifically, we introduce a contrastive pixel-level objectness constraint that pulls the pixel representations within a region of an object instance closer, while pushing those from different object categories apart. To obtain object regions consistent with the true underlying object, we extract information from both depth maps and RGB-images in the form of multimodal clustering. Crucially, the objectness constraint is agnostic to the ground-truth semantic labels and, hence, appropriate for unsupervised domain adaptation. In this work, we show that our regularizer significantly improves top performing self-training methods (by up to 2 points) in various UDA benchmarks for semantic segmentation. We include all code in the supplementary.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2023.

Builds on

46 of 62 references.

References · 46

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  3. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  4. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  5. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  6. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,479
  7. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,329
  8. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,311
  9. 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 818
  10. 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 623
  11. 2018ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 623
  12. 2016Deep Transfer Learning with Joint Adaptation Networkscited by 612
34 more
  1. 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
  2. 2020FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 541
  3. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
  4. 2019Contrastive Adaptation Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 407
  5. 2016Domain Separation Networkscited by 320
  6. 2019Bidirectional Learning for Domain Adaptation of Semantic Segmentationcited by 308
  7. 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 282
  8. 2020DACS: Domain Adaptation via Cross-domain Mixed Samplingcited by 226
  9. 2018A DIRT-T Approach to Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 215
  10. 2020Unsupervised Intra-domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation through Self-Supervisioncited by 198
  11. 2018Progressive Feature Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 183
  12. 2020Instance Adaptive Self-Training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 177
  13. 2014Simultaneous Detection and Segmentationcited by 159
  14. 2020Learning Texture Invariant Representation for Domain Adaptation of Semantic Segmentationcited by 153
  15. 2019Category Anchor-Guided Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 151
  16. 2021Self-supervised Augmentation Consistency for Adapting Semantic Segmentationcited by 149
  17. 2020Classes Matter: A Fine-grained Adversarial Approach to Cross-domain Semantic Segmentationcited by 142
  18. 2019xMUDA: Cross-Modal Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Semantic Segmentationcited by 129
  19. 2020Differential Treatment for Stuff and Things: A Simple Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Method for Semantic Segmentationcited by 126
  20. 2018Learning Semantic Segmentation from Synthetic Data: A Geometrically Guided Input-Output Adaptation Approachcited by 119
  21. 2019All about Structure: Adapting Structural Information across Domains for Boosting Semantic Segmentationcited by 104
  22. 2019Constructing Self-motivated Pyramid Curriculums for Cross-Domain Semantic Segmentation: A Non-Adversarial Approachcited by 103
  23. 2018DCAN: Dual Channel-wise Alignment Networks for Unsupervised Scene Adaptationcited by 101
  24. 2019DADA: Depth-aware Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 97
  25. 2019Support and Invertibility in Domain-Invariant Representationscited by 87
  26. 2021Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation with Self-Supervised Depth Estimationcited by 80
  27. 2019Domain Adaptation with Asymmetrically-Relaxed Distribution Alignmentcited by 61
  28. 2018Not Using the Car to See the Sidewalk: Quantifying and Controlling the Effects of Context in Classification and Segmentationcited by 49
  29. 2018SPIGAN: Privileged Adversarial Learning from Simulationcited by 47
  30. 2019On Learning Invariant Representation for Domain Adaptationcited by 39
  31. 2020Context-Aware Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 36
  32. 2020Semantically Adaptive Image-to-image Translation for Domain Adaptation of Semantic Segmentationcited by 25
  33. 2020Transferring and Regularizing Prediction for Semantic Segmentationcited by 17
  34. 2019Casting Geometric Constraints in Semantic Segmentation as Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.