mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transferring and Regularizing Prediction for Semantic Segmentation

arXiv 2006.06570 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2020cs.CVcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic segmentation often requires a large set of images with pixel-level annotations. In the view of extremely expensive expert labeling, recent research has shown that the models trained on photo-realistic synthetic data (e.g., computer games) with computer-generated annotations can be adapted to real images. Despite this progress, without constraining the prediction on real images, the models will easily overfit on synthetic data due to severe domain mismatch. In this paper, we novelly exploit the intrinsic properties of semantic segmentation to alleviate such problem for model transfer. Specifically, we present a Regularizer of Prediction Transfer (RPT) that imposes the intrinsic properties as constraints to regularize model transfer in an unsupervised fashion. These constraints include patch-level, cluster-level and context-level semantic prediction consistencies at different levels of image formation. As the transfer is label-free and data-driven, the robustness of prediction is addressed by selectively involving a subset of image regions for model regularization. Extensive experiments are conducted to verify the proposal of RPT on the transfer of models trained on GTA5 and SYNTHIA (synthetic data) to Cityscapes dataset (urban street scenes). RPT shows consistent improvements when injecting the constraints on several neural networks for semantic segmentation. More remarkably, when integrating RPT into the adversarial-based segmentation framework, we report to-date the best results: mIoU of 53.2%/51.7% when transferring from GTA5/SYNTHIA to Cityscapes, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 2.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Self-supervised Augmentation Consistency for Adapting Semantic Segmentationcited by 149
  2. 2021Generalize then Adapt: Source-Free Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 81
  3. 2021Re-distributing Biased Pseudo Labels for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation: A Baseline Investigationcited by 78
  4. 2023Survey on Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation for Visual Perception in Automated Drivingcited by 29
  5. 2023Semantic Image Segmentation: Two Decades of Researchcited by 26
  6. 2022On the Road to Online Adaptation for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 23
  7. 2021Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Image Segmentation: a Comprehensive Surveycited by 19
  8. 2021A Curriculum-style Self-training Approach for Source-Free Semantic Segmentationcited by 10
  9. 2022Unsupervised Contrastive Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 6
  10. 2023TransAdapt: A Transformative Framework for Online Test Time Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 6
  11. 2021Transformer-Unet: Raw Image Processing with Unetcited by 5
  12. 2022SUPRA: Superpixel Guided Loss for Improved Multi-modal Segmentation in Endoscopycited by 3
5 more
  1. 2022Explaining Cross-Domain Recognition with Interpretable Deep Classifiercited by 2
  2. 2024Domain Generalization for Endoscopic Image Segmentation by Disentangling Style-Content Information and SuperPixel Consistencycited by 2
  3. 2023HazardNet: Road Debris Detection by Augmentation of Synthetic Modelscited by 1
  4. 2023Regularizing Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via Structural Constraintscited by 0
  5. 2024SP 3 : Superpixel-propagated pseudo-label learning for weakly semi-supervised medical image segmentationcited by 0