mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Combining Adversaries with Anti-adversaries in Training

arXiv 2304.12550 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training is an effective learning technique to improve the robustness of deep neural networks. In this study, the influence of adversarial training on deep learning models in terms of fairness, robustness, and generalization is theoretically investigated under more general perturbation scope that different samples can have different perturbation directions (the adversarial and anti-adversarial directions) and varied perturbation bounds. Our theoretical explorations suggest that the combination of adversaries and anti-adversaries (samples with anti-adversarial perturbations) in training can be more effective in achieving better fairness between classes and a better tradeoff between robustness and generalization in some typical learning scenarios (e.g., noisy label learning and imbalance learning) compared with standard adversarial training. On the basis of our theoretical findings, a more general learning objective that combines adversaries and anti-adversaries with varied bounds on each training sample is presented. Meta learning is utilized to optimize the combination weights. Experiments on benchmark datasets under different learning scenarios verify our theoretical findings and the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2023.

Builds on

27 of 35 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  6. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  7. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  8. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  9. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,143
  10. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,018
  11. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  12. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
15 more
  1. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  2. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  3. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
  4. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
  5. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 200
  6. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 172
  7. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 163
  8. 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
  9. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 132
  10. 2020Smooth Adversarial Trainingcited by 89
  11. 2021Learning Fast Sample Re-weighting Without Reward Datacited by 69
  12. 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
  13. 2019Instance adaptive adversarial training: Improved accuracy tradeoffs in neural netscited by 55
  14. 2019Robust Local Features for Improving the Generalization of Adversarial Trainingcited by 30
  15. 2021Understanding the Interaction of Adversarial Training with Noisy Labelscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

6 papers.