NPAT Null-Space Projected Adversarial Training Towards Zero Deterioration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To mitigate the susceptibility of neural networks to adversarial attacks, adversarial training has emerged as a prevalent and effective defense strategy. Intrinsically, this countermeasure incurs a trade-off, as it sacrifices the model's accuracy in processing normal samples. To reconcile the trade-off, we pioneer the incorporation of null-space projection into adversarial training and propose two innovative Null-space Projection based Adversarial Training(NPAT) algorithms tackling sample generation and gradient optimization, named Null-space Projected Data Augmentation (NPDA) and Null-space Projected Gradient Descent (NPGD), to search for an overarching optimal solutions, which enhance robustness with almost zero deterioration in generalization performance. Adversarial samples and perturbations are constrained within the null-space of the decision boundary utilizing a closed-form null-space projector, effectively mitigating threat of attack stemming from unreliable features. Subsequently, we conducted experiments on the CIFAR10 and SVHN datasets and reveal that our methodology can seamlessly combine with adversarial training methods and obtain comparable robustness while keeping generalization close to a high-accuracy model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2024.
Builds on
21 of 26 references.
References · 21
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 442
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
9 more
- 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
- 2021Training Networks in Null Space of Feature Covariance for Continual Learningcited by 139
- 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
- 2022Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definitioncited by 109
- 2015Analysis of classifiers' robustness to adversarial perturbationscited by 76
- 2019Robustness to Adversarial Perturbations in Learning from Incomplete Datacited by 49
- 2019Adversarial Robustness May Be at Odds With Simplicitycited by 39
- 2023Combining Adversaries with Anti-adversaries in Trainingcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.