Quantifying and Defending against Privacy Threats on Federated Knowledge Graph Embedding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) is a fundamental technique that extracts expressive representation from knowledge graph (KG) to facilitate diverse downstream tasks. The emerging federated KGE (FKGE) collaboratively trains from distributed KGs held among clients while avoiding exchanging clients' sensitive raw KGs, which can still suffer from privacy threats as evidenced in other federated model trainings (e.g., neural networks). However, quantifying and defending against such privacy threats remain unexplored for FKGE which possesses unique properties not shared by previously studied models. In this paper, we conduct the first holistic study of the privacy threat on FKGE from both attack and defense perspectives. For the attack, we quantify the privacy threat by proposing three new inference attacks, which reveal substantial privacy risk by successfully inferring the existence of the KG triple from victim clients. For the defense, we propose DP-Flames, a novel differentially private FKGE with private selection, which offers a better privacy-utility tradeoff by exploiting the entity-binding sparse gradient property of FKGE and comes with a tight privacy accountant by incorporating the state-of-the-art private selection technique. We further propose an adaptive privacy budget allocation policy to dynamically adjust defense magnitude across the training procedure. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that the proposed defense can successfully mitigate the privacy threat by effectively reducing the success rate of inference attacks from 83.1% to 59.4% on average with only a modest utility decrease.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2023.
Builds on
27 of 56 references.
References · 27
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2014Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Basescited by 932
- 2016Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Predictioncited by 902
- 2019RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Spacecited by 898
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
- 2017DeepPath: A Reinforcement Learning Method for Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 266
15 more
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 236
- 2020Information Leakage in Embedding Modelscited by 203
- 2020Stealing Links from Graph Neural Networkscited by 115
- 2019AdaCliP: Adaptive Clipping for Private SGDcited by 77
- 2019Differentially Private Model Publishing for Deep Learningcited by 71
- 2021LinkTeller: Recovering Private Edges from Graph Neural Networks via Influence Analysiscited by 65
- 2014Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddingscited by 58
- 2020FedE: Embedding Knowledge Graphs in Federated Settingcited by 46
- 2021Differentially Private Federated Knowledge Graphs Embeddingcited by 45
- 2019Practical Differentially Private Top-k Selection with Pay-what-you-get Compositioncited by 39
- 2016Understanding the Sparse Vector Technique for Differential Privacycited by 27
- 2020Kamino: Constraint-Aware Differentially Private Data Synthesiscited by 25
- 2022Efficient Federated Learning on Knowledge Graphs via Privacy-preserving Relation Embedding Aggregationcited by 18
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Knowledge Graphscited by 11
- 2022Adaptive Private-K-Selection with Adaptive K and Application to Multi-label PATEcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Learning Federated Neural Graph Databases for Answering Complex Queries from Distributed Knowledge Graphscited by 4
- 2025Are Neuro-Inspired Multi-Modal Vision-Language Models Resilient to Membership Inference Privacy Leakage?cited by 2
- 2024Federated Knowledge Graph Unlearning via Diffusion Modelcited by 1
- 2025Hyper-modal Imputation Diffusion Embedding with Dual-Distillation for Federated Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 1
- 2025Towards Mitigating Excessive Forgetting in LLM Unlearning via Entanglement-Guidance with Proxy Constraintcited by 1
- 2026Inferring Sensitive Attributes from Knowledge Graph Embeddings: Attack and Defense Strategiescited by 0
- 2026Cost Characterization of Vertically Partitioned Federated Knowledge Graphscited by 0
- 2026Cost Characterization of Vertically Partitioned Federated Knowledge Graphs12 Sep 2026
- 2026Inferring Sensitive Attributes from Knowledge Graph Embeddings: Attack and Defense Strategies19 May 2026
- 2025Are Neuro-Inspired Multi-Modal Vision-Language Models Resilient to Membership Inference Privacy Leakage?24 Nov 2025
- 2025Towards Mitigating Excessive Forgetting in LLM Unlearning via Entanglement-Guidance with Proxy Constraint28 Aug 2025
- 2025Hyper-modal Imputation Diffusion Embedding with Dual-Distillation for Federated Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completion27 Jun 2025
- 2024Federated Knowledge Graph Unlearning via Diffusion Model13 Mar 2024
- 2024Learning Federated Neural Graph Databases for Answering Complex Queries from Distributed Knowledge Graphs22 Feb 2024