mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Impact of Video Processing Operations in Deepfake Detection

arXiv 2303.17247 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2023cs.CV eess.IVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The detection of digital face manipulation in video has attracted extensive attention due to the increased risk to public trust. To counteract the malicious usage of such techniques, deep learning-based deepfake detection methods have been developed and have shown impressive results. However, the performance of these detectors is often evaluated using benchmarks that hardly reflect real-world situations. For example, the impact of various video processing operations on detection accuracy has not been systematically assessed. To address this gap, this paper first analyzes numerous real-world influencing factors and typical video processing operations. Then, a more systematic assessment methodology is proposed, which allows for a quantitative evaluation of a detector's robustness under the influence of different processing operations. Moreover, substantial experiments have been carried out on three popular deepfake detectors, which give detailed analyses on the impact of each operation and bring insights to foster future research.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2023.

Builds on

27 of 33 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  2. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  3. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  4. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  5. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
  6. 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 573
  7. 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 518
  8. 2021Multi-attentional Deepfake Detectioncited by 339
  9. 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 332
  10. 2019FSGAN: Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and Reenactmentcited by 319
  11. 2018Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Posescited by 294
  12. 2019Few-Shot Adversarial Learning of Realistic Neural Talking Head Modelscited by 284
15 more
  1. 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 261
  2. 2019On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulationcited by 259
  3. 2019Deferred Neural Rendering: Image Synthesis using Neural Texturescited by 253
  4. 2020DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detectioncited by 251
  5. 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 241
  6. 2018DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detectioncited by 208
  7. 2021Exploring Temporal Coherence for More General Video Face Forgery Detectioncited by 158
  8. 2021Frequency-aware Discriminative Feature Learning Supervised by Single-Center Loss for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 133
  9. 2018Two-Stream Neural Networks for Tampered Face Detectioncited by 125
  10. 2020The DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Datasetcited by 125
  11. 2019Recurrent Convolutional Strategies for Face Manipulation Detection in Videoscited by 118
  12. 2019Use of a Capsule Network to Detect Fake Images and Videoscited by 63
  13. 2019On the generalization of GAN image forensicscited by 36
  14. 2020Deepfakes Detection with Automatic Face Weightingcited by 35
  15. 2018On Low-Resolution Face Recognition in the Wild: Comparisons and New Techniquescited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.