Advances in apparent conceptual physics reasoning in GPT-4
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
ChatGPT is built on a large language model trained on an enormous corpus of human text to emulate human conversation. Despite lacking any explicit programming regarding the laws of physics, recent work has demonstrated that GPT-3.5 could pass an introductory physics course at some nominal level and register something close to a minimal understanding of Newtonian Mechanics on the Force Concept Inventory. This work replicates those results and also demonstrates that the latest version, GPT-4, has reached a much higher mark in the latter context. Indeed, its responses come quite close to perfectly demonstrating expert-level competence, with a few very notable exceptions and limitations. We briefly comment on the implications of this for the future of physics education and pedagogy.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2023.
Builds on
7 of 35 references.
References · 7
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2022GPT Takes the Bar Examcited by 65
- 2023AI and the FCI: Can ChatGPT Project an Understanding of Introductory Physics?cited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2023Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Modelscited by 152
- 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attackscited by 32
- 2024Tradeoffs Between Alignment and Helpfulness in Language Models with Steering Methodscited by 26
- 2024When does compositional structure yield compositional generalization? A kernel theorycited by 19
- 2023Unreflected Acceptance -- Investigating the Negative Consequences of ChatGPT-Assisted Problem Solving in Physics Educationcited by 7
- 2023Testing LLM performance on the Physics GRE: some observationscited by 4
- 2024Compositional Hardness of Code in Large Language Models -- A Probabilistic Perspectivecited by 3
- 2024Should We Fear Large Language Models? A Structural Analysis of the Human Reasoning System for Elucidating LLM Capabilities and Risks Through the Lens of Heidegger's Philosophycited by 2
- 2023A criterion for Artificial General Intelligence: hypothetic-deductive reasoning, tested on ChatGPTcited by 1
- 2024Scaffold or Crutch? Examining College Students' Use and Views of Generative AI Tools for STEM Educationcited by 0
- 2025Causes in neuron diagrams, and testing causal reasoning in Large Language Models. A glimpse of the future of philosophy?cited by 0
- 2026Feedback Indices to Evaluate LLM Responses to Rebuttals for Multiple Choice Type Questionscited by 0
- 2026Feedback Indices to Evaluate LLM Responses to Rebuttals for Multiple Choice Type Questions2 Jan 2026
- 2025Causes in neuron diagrams, and testing causal reasoning in Large Language Models. A glimpse of the future of philosophy?17 Jun 2025
- 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attacks18 Feb 2025
- 2024Scaffold or Crutch? Examining College Students' Use and Views of Generative AI Tools for STEM Education3 Dec 2024
- 2024Compositional Hardness of Code in Large Language Models -- A Probabilistic Perspective26 Sep 2024
- 2024When does compositional structure yield compositional generalization? A kernel theory26 May 2024
- 2024Should We Fear Large Language Models? A Structural Analysis of the Human Reasoning System for Elucidating LLM Capabilities and Risks Through the Lens of Heidegger's Philosophy5 Mar 2024
- 2024Tradeoffs Between Alignment and Helpfulness in Language Models with Steering Methods29 Jan 2024
- 2023Testing LLM performance on the Physics GRE: some observations7 Dec 2023
- 2023Unreflected Acceptance -- Investigating the Negative Consequences of ChatGPT-Assisted Problem Solving in Physics Education21 Aug 2023
- 2023A criterion for Artificial General Intelligence: hypothetic-deductive reasoning, tested on ChatGPT5 Aug 2023
- 2023Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Models19 Apr 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems
- 2025PhysUniBench: A Multi-Modal Physics Reasoning Benchmark at Undergraduate Level
- 2025UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models
- 2025Symbolic or Numerical? Understanding Physics Problem Solving in Reasoning LLMs
- 2025PhysicsEval: Inference-Time Techniques to Improve the Reasoning Proficiency of Large Language Models on Physics Problems
- 2026Decoupled Physical Modeling and Execution for Physics Reasoning
- 2025ABench-Physics: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in LLMs via High-Difficulty and Dynamic Physics Problems
- 2025Scaling Physical Reasoning with the PHYSICS Dataset