Symbolic or Numerical? Understanding Physics Problem Solving in Reasoning LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Navigating the complexities of physics reasoning has long been a difficult task for Large Language Models (LLMs), requiring a synthesis of profound conceptual understanding and adept problem-solving techniques. In this study, we investigate the application of advanced instruction-tuned reasoning models, such as Deepseek-R1, to address a diverse spectrum of physics problems curated from the challenging SciBench benchmark. Our comprehensive experimental evaluation reveals the remarkable capabilities of reasoning models. Not only do they achieve state-of-the-art accuracy in answering intricate physics questions, but they also generate distinctive reasoning patterns that emphasize on symbolic derivation. Furthermore, our findings indicate that even for these highly sophisticated reasoning models, the strategic incorporation of few-shot prompting can still yield measurable improvements in overall accuracy, highlighting the potential for continued performance gains.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.
Builds on
11 of 21 references.
References · 11
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
- 2023CDEval: A Benchmark for Measuring the Cultural Dimensions of Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2023Input-gradient space particle inference for neural network ensemblescited by 7
- 2024An Analysis of User Behaviors for Objectively Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Systemscited by 2
- 2023Uncertainty Quantification and Confidence Intervals for Naive Rare-Event Estimatorscited by 1
- 2024Controlling Cloze-test Question Item Difficulty with PLM-based Surrogate Models for IRT Assessmentcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models
- 2025PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based Reasoning
- 2025PhysicsEval: Inference-Time Techniques to Improve the Reasoning Proficiency of Large Language Models on Physics Problems
- 2026PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems
- 2025ABench-Physics: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in LLMs via High-Difficulty and Dynamic Physics Problems
- 2025Scaling Physical Reasoning with the PHYSICS Dataset
- 2025PhysUniBench: A Multi-Modal Physics Reasoning Benchmark at Undergraduate Level
- 2026Scientific Logicality Enriched Methodology for LLM Reasoning: A Practice in Physics