mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Testing LLM performance on the Physics GRE: some observations

arXiv 2312.04613 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2023physics.ed-ph cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the recent developments in large language models (LLMs) and their widespread availability through open source models and/or low-cost APIs, several exciting products and applications are emerging, many of which are in the field of STEM educational technology for K-12 and university students. There is a need to evaluate these powerful language models on several benchmarks, in order to understand their risks and limitations. In this short paper, we summarize and analyze the performance of Bard, a popular LLM-based conversational service made available by Google, on the standardized Physics GRE examination.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.

Builds on

11 of 20 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  6. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  7. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  8. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
  9. 2019Ludwig: a type-based declarative deep learning toolboxcited by 24
  10. 2023Advances in apparent conceptual physics reasoning in GPT-4cited by 12
  11. 2023Can ChatGPT pass the Vietnamese National High School Graduation Examination?cited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.