mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PhysicsEval: Inference-Time Techniques to Improve the Reasoning Proficiency of Large Language Models on Physics Problems

arXiv 2508.00079 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

The discipline of physics stands as a cornerstone of human intellect, driving the evolution of technology and deepening our understanding of the fundamental principles of the cosmos. Contemporary literature includes some works centered on the task of solving physics problems - a crucial domain of natural language reasoning. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of frontier LLMs in solving physics problems, both mathematical and descriptive. We also employ a plethora of inference-time techniques and agentic frameworks to improve the performance of the models. This includes the verification of proposed solutions in a cumulative fashion by other, smaller LLM agents, and we perform a comparative analysis of the performance that the techniques entail. There are significant improvements when the multi-agent framework is applied to problems that the models initially perform poorly on. Furthermore, we introduce a new evaluation benchmark for physics problems, rm Psmall HYSICSEsmall VAL, consisting of 19,609 problems sourced from various physics textbooks and their corresponding correct solutions scraped from physics forums and educational websites. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/areebuzair/PhysicsEval.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.

Builds on

21 of 60 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025PHYBench: Holistic Evaluation of Physical Perception and Reasoning in Large Language Models22 Apr
  2. 2025FEABench: Evaluating Language Models on Multiphysics Reasoning Ability8 Apr
  3. 2025Theoretical Physics Benchmark (TPBench) -- a Dataset and Study of AI Reasoning Capabilities in Theoretical Physics19 Feb
  4. 2025PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based Reasoning17 Feb
  5. 2025UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models1 Feb

Other references · 16

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  5. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
  6. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  7. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,220
  8. 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 916
  9. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
  10. 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 491
  11. 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 243
  12. 2023Cumulative Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 94
4 more
  1. 2025CURIE: Evaluating LLMs On Multitask Scientific Long Context Understanding and Reasoningcited by 28
  2. 2023Using Large Language Model to Solve and Explain Physics Word Problems Approaching Human Levelcited by 16
  3. 2024Enhancing LLMs for Physics Problem-Solving using Reinforcement Learning with Human-AI Feedbackcited by 6
  4. 2023Testing LLM performance on the Physics GRE: some observationscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ABench-Physics: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in LLMs via High-Difficulty and Dynamic Physics Problems
  2. 2026PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems
  3. 2025Can Theoretical Physics Research Benefit from Language Agents?
  4. 2024Improving Physics Reasoning in Large Language Models Using Mixture of Refinement Agents
  5. 2025Symbolic or Numerical? Understanding Physics Problem Solving in Reasoning LLMs
  6. 2025Large Physics Models: Towards a collaborative approach with Large Language Models and Foundation Models
  7. 2026Scientific Logicality Enriched Methodology for LLM Reasoning: A Practice in Physics
  8. 2025PhysicsArena: The First Multimodal Physics Reasoning Benchmark Exploring Variable, Process, and Solution Dimensions