Should We Fear Large Language Models? A Structural Analysis of the Human Reasoning System for Elucidating LLM Capabilities and Risks Through the Lens of Heidegger's Philosophy
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
In the rapidly evolving field of Large Language Models (LLMs), there is a critical need to thoroughly analyze their capabilities and risks. Central to our investigation are two novel elements. Firstly, it is the innovative parallels between the statistical patterns of word relationships within LLMs and Martin Heidegger's concepts of "ready-to-hand" and "present-at-hand," which encapsulate the utilitarian and scientific altitudes humans employ in interacting with the world. This comparison lays the groundwork for positioning LLMs as the digital counterpart to the Faculty of Verbal Knowledge, shedding light on their capacity to emulate certain facets of human reasoning. Secondly, a structural analysis of human reasoning, viewed through Heidegger's notion of truth as "unconcealment" is conducted This foundational principle enables us to map out the inputs and outputs of the reasoning system and divide reasoning into four distinct categories. Respective cognitive faculties are delineated, allowing us to place LLMs within the broader schema of human reasoning, thus clarifying their strengths and inherent limitations. Our findings reveal that while LLMs possess the capability for Direct Explicative Reasoning and Pseudo Rational Reasoning, they fall short in authentic rational reasoning and have no creative reasoning capabilities, due to the current lack of many analogous AI models such as the Faculty of Judgement. The potential and risks of LLMs when they are augmented with other AI technologies are also evaluated. The results indicate that although LLMs have achieved proficiency in some reasoning abilities, the aspiration to match or exceed human intellectual capabilities is yet unattained. This research not only enriches our comprehension of LLMs but also propels forward the discourse on AI's potential and its bounds, paving the way for future explorations into AI's evolving landscape.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2024.
Builds on
18 of 75 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Report17 May
Other references · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,007
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
- 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 557
5 more
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
- 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 167
- 2020Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in Transformerscited by 41
- 2023Advances in apparent conceptual physics reasoning in GPT-4cited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Take Caution in Using LLMs as Human Surrogates: Scylla Ex Machina
- 2023Are LLMs the Master of All Trades? : Exploring Domain-Agnostic Reasoning Skills of LLMs
- 2024LLM Theory of Mind and Alignment: Opportunities and Risks
- 2025Reasoning on a Spectrum: Aligning LLMs to System 1 and System 2 Thinking
- 2024Do Large Language Models Truly Grasp Mathematics? An Empirical Exploration From Cognitive Psychology
- 2026LLM and Human Modes of Representation
- 2024Comparing Inferential Strategies of Humans and Large Language Models in Deductive Reasoning
- 2025Do Large Language Models Reason Causally Like Us? Even Better?