mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DSSmoothing: Toward Certified Dataset Ownership Verification for Pre-trained Language Models via Dual-Space Smoothing

arXiv 2510.15303 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.CYcited by 2

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Large web-scale datasets have driven the rapid advancement of pre-trained language models (PLMs), but unauthorized data usage has raised serious copyright concerns. Existing dataset ownership verification (DOV) methods typically assume that watermarks remain stable during inference; however, this assumption often fails under natural noise and adversary-crafted perturbations. We propose the first certified dataset ownership verification method for PLMs under a gray-box setting (i.e., the defender can only query the suspicious model but is aware of its input representation module), based on dual-space smoothing (i.e., DSSmoothing). To address the challenges of text discreteness and semantic sensitivity, DSSmoothing introduces continuous perturbations in the embedding space to capture semantic robustness and applies controlled token reordering in the permutation space to capture sequential robustness. DSSmoothing consists of two stages: in the first stage, triggers are collaboratively embedded in both spaces to generate norm-constrained and robust watermarked datasets; in the second stage, randomized smoothing is applied in both spaces during verification to compute the watermark robustness (WR) of suspicious models and statistically compare it with the principal probability (PP) values of a set of benign models. Theoretically, DSSmoothing provides provable robustness guarantees for dataset ownership verification by ensuring that WR consistently exceeds PP under bounded dual-space perturbations. Extensive experiments on multiple representative web datasets demonstrate that DSSmoothing achieves stable and reliable verification performance and exhibits robustness against potential adaptive attacks. Our code is available at https://github.com/NcepuQiaoTing/DSSmoothing.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.

Builds on

21 of 42 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  3. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  4. 2020Weight Poisoning Attacks on Pre-trained Modelscited by 341
  5. 2019A backdoor attack against LSTM-based text classification systemscited by 227
  6. 2021Hidden Killer: Invisible Textual Backdoor Attacks with Syntactic Triggercited by 222
  7. 2020BadNL: Backdoor Attacks against NLP Models with Semantic-preserving Improvementscited by 211
  8. 2017Neural Trojanscited by 153
  9. 2022Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protectioncited by 86
  10. 2022A Unified Evaluation of Textual Backdoor Learning: Frameworks and Benchmarkscited by 74
  11. 2020SAFER: A Structure-free Approach for Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 73
  12. 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 65
9 more
  1. 2023Domain Watermark: Effective and Harmless Dataset Copyright Protection is Closed at Handcited by 57
  2. 2022Certified Neural Network Watermarks with Randomized Smoothingcited by 41
  3. 2023Did You Train on My Dataset? Towards Public Dataset Protection with Clean-Label Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 37
  4. 2023Text-CRS: A Generalized Certified Robustness Framework against Textual Adversarial Attackscited by 34
  5. 2024PointNCBW: Towards Dataset Ownership Verification for Point Clouds via Negative Clean-label Backdoor Watermarkcited by 20
  6. 2023TextGuard: Provable Defense against Backdoor Attacks on Text Classificationcited by 16
  7. 2024A General Framework for Data-Use Auditing of ML Modelscited by 16
  8. 2025DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspectivecited by 8
  9. 2025CBW: Towards Dataset Ownership Verification for Speaker Verification via Clustering-based Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025STAMP Your Content: Proving Dataset Membership via Watermarked Rephrasings
  2. 2026Watermarking for Proprietary Dataset Protection
  3. 2025Leave No TRACE: Black-box Detection of Copyrighted Dataset Usage in Large Language Models via Watermarking
  4. 2026Dataset Watermarking with Provable Black-Box Detection
  5. 2025Robust Data Watermarking in Language Models by Injecting Fictitious Knowledge
  6. 2026SLIM: Stealthy Low-Coverage Black-Box Watermarking via Latent-Space Confusion Zones
  7. 2025CertDW: Towards Certified Dataset Ownership Verification via Conformal Calibration
  8. 2026Functional Subspace Watermarking for Large Language Models