mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dataset Ownership Verification for Pre-trained Masked Models

arXiv 2507.12022 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality open-source datasets have emerged as a pivotal catalyst driving the swift advancement of deep learning, while facing the looming threat of potential exploitation. Protecting these datasets is of paramount importance for the interests of their owners. The verification of dataset ownership has evolved into a crucial approach in this domain; however, existing verification techniques are predominantly tailored to supervised models and contrastive pre-trained models, rendering them ill-suited for direct application to the increasingly prevalent masked models. In this work, we introduce the inaugural methodology addressing this critical, yet unresolved challenge, termed Dataset Ownership Verification for Masked Modeling (DOV4MM). The central objective is to ascertain whether a suspicious black-box model has been pre-trained on a particular unlabeled dataset, thereby assisting dataset owners in safeguarding their rights. DOV4MM is grounded in our empirical observation that when a model is pre-trained on the target dataset, the difficulty of reconstructing masked information within the embedding space exhibits a marked contrast to models not pre-trained on that dataset. We validated the efficacy of DOV4MM through ten masked image models on ImageNet-1K and four masked language models on WikiText-103. The results demonstrate that DOV4MM rejects the null hypothesis, with a p-value considerably below 0.05, surpassing all prior approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/xieyc99/DOV4MM.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2025.

Builds on

49 of 58 references.

References · 49

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  8. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  9. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  10. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  11. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  12. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
37 more
  1. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  3. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
  4. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  5. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
  6. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,153
  7. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 903
  8. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
  9. 2022EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 691
  10. 2021Masked Feature Prediction for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 576
  11. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 388
  12. 2022BEiT v2: Masked Image Modeling with Vector-Quantized Visual Tokenizerscited by 303
  13. 2022Context Autoencoder for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 297
  14. 2021Poisoning and Backdooring Contrastive Learningcited by 151
  15. 2021SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statisticscited by 130
  16. 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
  17. 2021Backdoor Attacks on Self-Supervised Learningcited by 90
  18. 2022Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protectioncited by 86
  19. 2023The MiniPile Challenge for Data-Efficient Language Modelscited by 75
  20. 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 65
  21. 2023Domain Watermark: Effective and Harmless Dataset Copyright Protection is Closed at Handcited by 57
  22. 2022MixMAE: Mixed and Masked Autoencoder for Efficient Pretraining of Hierarchical Vision Transformerscited by 47
  23. 2020WDNet: Watermark-Decomposition Network for Visible Watermark Removalcited by 37
  24. 2023Did You Train on My Dataset? Towards Public Dataset Protection with Clean-Label Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 37
  25. 2022Dataset Inference for Self-Supervised Modelscited by 36
  26. 2022Can't Steal? Cont-Steal! Contrastive Stealing Attacks Against Image Encoderscited by 31
  27. 2022An Embarrassingly Simple Backdoor Attack on Self-supervised Learningcited by 31
  28. 2022CorruptEncoder: Data Poisoning based Backdoor Attacks to Contrastive Learningcited by 29
  29. 2023PixMIM: Rethinking Pixel Reconstruction in Masked Image Modelingcited by 28
  30. 2022StolenEncoder: Stealing Pre-trained Encoders in Self-supervised Learningcited by 23
  31. 2023Defending Against Patch-based Backdoor Attacks on Self-Supervised Learningcited by 20
  32. 2022MimCo: Masked Image Modeling Pre-training with Contrastive Teachercited by 16
  33. 2023Masked Modeling for Self-supervised Representation Learning on Vision and Beyondcited by 13
  34. 2023SSL-Cleanse: Trojan Detection and Mitigation in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 11
  35. 2024A Unified Membership Inference Method for Visual Self-supervised Encoder via Part-aware Capabilitycited by 9
  36. 2025Dataset Ownership Verification in Contrastive Pre-trained Modelscited by 6
  37. 2025Training Data Provenance Verification: Did Your Model Use Synthetic Data from My Generative Model for Training?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.