Evading Data Provenance in Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern over-parameterized deep models are highly data-dependent, with large scale general-purpose and domain-specific datasets serving as the bedrock for rapid advancements. However, many datasets are proprietary or contain sensitive information, making unrestricted model training problematic. In the open world where data thefts cannot be fully prevented, Dataset Ownership Verification (DOV) has emerged as a promising method to protect copyright by detecting unauthorized model training and tracing illicit activities. Due to its diversity and superior stealth, evading DOV is considered extremely challenging. However, this paper identifies that previous studies have relied on oversimplistic evasion attacks for evaluation, leading to a false sense of security. We introduce a unified evasion framework, in which a teacher model first learns from the copyright dataset and then transfers task-relevant yet identifier-independent domain knowledge to a surrogate student using an out-of-distribution (OOD) dataset as the intermediary. Leveraging Vision-Language Models and Large Language Models, we curate the most informative and reliable subsets from the OOD gallery set as the final transfer set, and propose selectively transferring task-oriented knowledge to achieve a better trade-off between generalization and evasion effectiveness. Experiments across diverse datasets covering eleven DOV methods demonstrate our approach simultaneously eliminates all copyright identifiers and significantly outperforms nine state-of-the-art evasion attacks in both generalization and effectiveness, with moderate computational overhead. As a proof of concept, we reveal key vulnerabilities in current DOV methods, highlighting the need for long-term development to enhance practicality.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 69 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2025.
Builds on
69 of 105 references.
References · 69
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
38 more
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,228
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
- 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 580
- 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 546
- 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 357
- 2021Neural Attention Distillation: Erasing Backdoor Triggers from Deep Neural Networkscited by 324
- 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 302
- 2019Label-Consistent Backdoor Attackscited by 296
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 292
- 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 267
- 2021Unlearnable Examples: Making Personal Data Unexploitablecited by 193
- 2021Does Knowledge Distillation Really Work?cited by 190
- 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 183
- 2020Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defensescited by 180
- 2021Adversarial Unlearning of Backdoors via Implicit Hypergradientcited by 166
- 2020Geometric Dataset Distances via Optimal Transportcited by 158
- 2020Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extractioncited by 149
- 2018Constructing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples with Generative Modelscited by 135
- 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
- 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 110
- 2022Narcissus: A Practical Clean-Label Backdoor Attack with Limited Informationcited by 103
- 2023MobileCLIP: Fast Image-Text Models through Multi-Modal Reinforced Trainingcited by 96
- 2019Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation Modelscited by 88
- 2022Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and Strongercited by 88
- 2018Universal Adversarial Trainingcited by 87
- 2022Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protectioncited by 86
- 2021CAFE: Catastrophic Data Leakage in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 76
- 2020Radioactive data: tracing through trainingcited by 67
- 2023BadCLIP: Trigger-Aware Prompt Learning for Backdoor Attacks on CLIPcited by 67
- 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 65
- 2020Certified Robustness of Nearest Neighbors against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attackscited by 60
- 2023Domain Watermark: Effective and Harmless Dataset Copyright Protection is Closed at Handcited by 57
- 2022Mechanistic Mode Connectivitycited by 50
50 most cited of 69 All 69 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2021Copy, Right? A Testing Framework for Copyright Protection of Deep Learning Models
- 2026From Compression to Accountability: Harmless Copyright Protection for Dataset Distillation ↗
- 2023Turn Passive to Active: A Survey on Active Intellectual Property Protection of Deep Learning Models
- 2025CertDW: Towards Certified Dataset Ownership Verification via Conformal Calibration
- 2025Towards Dataset Copyright Evasion Attack against Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
- 2022On the Effectiveness of Dataset Watermarking in Adversarial Settings
- 2023False Claims against Model Ownership Resolution
- 2023VeriDIP: Verifying Ownership of Deep Neural Networks through Privacy Leakage Fingerprints