Data Taggants: Dataset Ownership Verification via Harmless Targeted Data Poisoning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models
Abstract (arXiv)
Dataset ownership verification, the process of determining if a dataset is used in a model's training data, is necessary for detecting unauthorized data usage and data contamination. Existing approaches, such as backdoor watermarking, rely on inducing a detectable behavior into the trained model on a part of the data distribution. However, these approaches have limitations, as they can be harmful to the model's performances or require unpractical access to the model's internals. Most importantly, previous approaches lack guarantee against false positives. This paper introduces data taggants, a novel non-backdoor dataset ownership verification technique. Our method uses pairs of out-of-distribution samples and random labels as secret keys, and leverages clean-label targeted data poisoning to subtly alter a dataset, so that models trained on it respond to the key samples with the corresponding key labels. The keys are built as to allow for statistical certificates with black-box access only to the model. We validate our approach through comprehensive and realistic experiments on ImageNet1k using ViT and ResNet models with state-of-the-art training recipes. Our findings demonstrate that data taggants can reliably detect models trained on the protected dataset with high confidence, without compromising validation accuracy, and show their superiority over backdoor watermarking. We demonstrate the stealthiness and robustness of our method against various defense mechanisms.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.
Builds on
29 of 39 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 28
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
- 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 457
- 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 429
- 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 417
- 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 365
- 2020Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific Triggerscited by 338
- 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
- 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 156
16 more
- 2021On the Importance of Difficulty Calibration in Membership Inference Attackscited by 137
- 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 115
- 2021Sleeper Agent: Scalable Hidden Trigger Backdoors for Neural Networks Trained from Scratchcited by 98
- 2021Watermarking Images in Self-Supervised Latent Spacescited by 90
- 2022Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protectioncited by 80
- 2020Radioactive data: tracing through trainingcited by 67
- 2020Robust Out-of-distribution Detection for Neural Networkscited by 57
- 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 57
- 2023Domain Watermark: Effective and Harmless Dataset Copyright Protection is Closed at Handcited by 52
- 2024Membership Inference Attacks Cannot Prove that a Model Was Trained On Your Datacited by 49
- 2023Did You Train on My Dataset? Towards Public Dataset Protection with Clean-Label Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 37
- 2021DP-InstaHide: Provably Defusing Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks with Differentially Private Data Augmentationscited by 33
- 2020Open-sourced Dataset Protection via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 30
- 2019Invisible Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks via Steganography and Regularizationcited by 17
- 2022Back to the Basics: Revisiting Out-of-Distribution Detection Baselinescited by 16
- 2022Data Isotopes for Data Provenance in DNNscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2026State Backdoor: Towards Stealthy Real-world Poisoning Attack on Vision-Language-Action Model in State Spacecited by 9
- 2025Winter Soldier: Backdooring Language Models at Pre-Training with Indirect Data Poisoningcited by 6
- 2024Inverting Gradient Attacks Makes Powerful Data Poisoningcited by 2
- 2025Towards Dataset Copyright Evasion Attack against Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 2
- 2025Targeted Data Poisoning for Black-Box Audio Datasets Ownership Verificationcited by 0
- 2025VICTOR: Dataset Copyright Auditing in Video Recognition Systemscited by 0
- 2026Validity Threats for Foundation Model Researchcited by 0
- 2026Trustworthy synthetic visual media: Evidence across the media lifecyclecited by 0
- 2026Trustworthy synthetic visual media: Evidence across the media lifecycle28 Sep 2026
- 2026Validity Threats for Foundation Model Research3 Jun 2026
- 2026State Backdoor: Towards Stealthy Real-world Poisoning Attack on Vision-Language-Action Model in State Space7 Jan 2026
- 2025VICTOR: Dataset Copyright Auditing in Video Recognition Systems16 Dec 2025
- 2025Winter Soldier: Backdooring Language Models at Pre-Training with Indirect Data Poisoning17 Jun 2025
- 2025Towards Dataset Copyright Evasion Attack against Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models5 May 2025
- 2025Targeted Data Poisoning for Black-Box Audio Datasets Ownership Verification13 Mar 2025
- 2024Inverting Gradient Attacks Makes Powerful Data Poisoning28 Oct 2024