mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Q-Bench+: A Benchmark for Multi-modal Foundation Models on Low-level Vision from Single Images to Pairs

arXiv 2402.07116 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2024cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid development of Multi-modality Large Language Models (MLLMs) has navigated a paradigm shift in computer vision, moving towards versatile foundational models. However, evaluating MLLMs in low-level visual perception and understanding remains a yet-to-explore domain. To this end, we design benchmark settings to emulate human language responses related to low-level vision: the low-level visual perception (A1) via visual question answering related to low-level attributes (e.g. clarity, lighting); and the low-level visual description (A2), on evaluating MLLMs for low-level text descriptions. Furthermore, given that pairwise comparison can better avoid ambiguity of responses and has been adopted by many human experiments, we further extend the low-level perception-related question-answering and description evaluations of MLLMs from single images to image pairs. Specifically, for perception (A1), we carry out the LLVisionQA+ dataset, comprising 2,990 single images and 1,999 image pairs each accompanied by an open-ended question about its low-level features; for description (A2), we propose the LLDescribe+ dataset, evaluating MLLMs for low-level descriptions on 499 single images and 450 pairs. Additionally, we evaluate MLLMs on assessment (A3) ability, i.e. predicting score, by employing a softmax-based approach to enable all MLLMs to generate quantifiable quality ratings, tested against human opinions in 7 image quality assessment (IQA) datasets. With 24 MLLMs under evaluation, we demonstrate that several MLLMs have decent low-level visual competencies on single images, but only GPT-4V exhibits higher accuracy on pairwise comparisons than single image evaluations (like humans). We hope that our benchmark will motivate further research into uncovering and enhancing these nascent capabilities of MLLMs. Datasets will be available at https://github.com/Q-Future/Q-Bench.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2024.

Builds on

48 of 74 references.

References · 48

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  6. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  7. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  8. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  9. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,689
  10. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  11. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
  12. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
36 more
  1. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  2. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,114
  3. 2023Kosmos-2: Grounding Multimodal Large Language Models to the Worldcited by 1,075
  4. 2023mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodalitycited by 1,038
  5. 2021GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infillingcited by 1,026
  6. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,010
  7. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 974
  8. 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehensioncited by 929
  9. 2023Shikra: Unleashing Multimodal LLM's Referential Dialogue Magiccited by 891
  10. 2023LISA: Reasoning Segmentation via Large Language Modelcited by 770
  11. 2023LLaMA-Adapter V2: Parameter-Efficient Visual Instruction Modelcited by 602
  12. 2023Otter: A Multi-Modal Model with In-Context Instruction Tuningcited by 548
  13. 2023mPLUG-Owl2: Revolutionizing Multi-modal Large Language Model with Modality Collaborationcited by 545
  14. 2023Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levelscited by 489
  15. 2023Generative Multimodal Models are In-Context Learnerscited by 446
  16. 2018nocaps: novel object captioning at scalecited by 444
  17. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
  18. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 351
  19. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  20. 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 314
  21. 2023InternLM-XComposer: A Vision-Language Large Model for Advanced Text-image Comprehension and Compositioncited by 297
  22. 2023SPHINX: The Joint Mixing of Weights, Tasks, and Visual Embeddings for Multi-modal Large Language Modelscited by 283
  23. 2023Q-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Foundation Models on Low-level Visioncited by 247
  24. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 221
  25. 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 208
  26. 2022FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Samplingcited by 179
  27. 2020PIPAL: a Large-Scale Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Perceptual Image Restorationcited by 177
  28. 2018PieAPP: Perceptual Image-Error Assessment through Pairwise Preferencecited by 158
  29. 2023Q-Instruct: Improving Low-level Visual Abilities for Multi-modality Foundation Modelscited by 152
  30. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  31. 2023AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 142
  32. 2016Photo Aesthetics Ranking Network with Attributes and Content Adaptationcited by 122
  33. 2022Neighbourhood Representative Sampling for Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessmentcited by 50
  34. 2023Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Computer Graphics Imagescited by 21
  35. 2022Exploring and Evaluating Image Restoration Potential in Dynamic Scenescited by 8
  36. 2022A No-Reference Deep Learning Quality Assessment Method for Super-resolution Images Based on Frequency Mapscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024LM4LV: A Frozen Large Language Model for Low-level Vision Tasks
  2. 2026Do Vision-Language Models See or Guess? Measuring and Reducing Textual-Prior Reliance with a Phrasing-Controlled Benchmark
  3. 2024Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning
  4. 2024MVP-Bench: Can Large Vision--Language Models Conduct Multi-level Visual Perception Like Humans?
  5. 2026Understanding the Fine-Grained Knowledge Capabilities of Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions
  7. 2025Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation
  8. 2024TUBench: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Trustworthiness with Unanswerable Questions