Mover: Mask and Recovery based Facial Part Consistency Aware Method for Deepfake Video Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deepfake techniques have been widely used for malicious purposes, prompting extensive research interest in developing Deepfake detection methods. Deepfake manipulations typically involve tampering with facial parts, which can result in inconsistencies across different parts of the face. For instance, Deepfake techniques may change smiling lips to an upset lip, while the eyes remain smiling. Existing detection methods depend on specific indicators of forgery, which tend to disappear as the forgery patterns are improved. To address the limitation, we propose Mover, a new Deepfake detection model that exploits unspecific facial part inconsistencies, which are inevitable weaknesses of Deepfake videos. Mover randomly masks regions of interest (ROIs) and recovers faces to learn unspecific features, which makes it difficult for fake faces to be recovered, while real faces can be easily recovered. Specifically, given a real face image, we first pretrain a masked autoencoder to learn facial part consistency by dividing faces into three parts and randomly masking ROIs, which are then recovered based on the unmasked facial parts. Furthermore, to maximize the discrepancy between real and fake videos, we propose a novel model with dual networks that utilize the pretrained encoder and masked autoencoder, respectively. 1) The pretrained encoder is finetuned for capturing the encoding of inconsistent information in the given video. 2) The pretrained masked autoencoder is utilized for mapping faces and distinguishing real and fake videos. Our extensive experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that Mover is highly effective.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2023.
Builds on
46 of 67 references.
References · 46
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
- 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 763
- 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 632
- 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
- 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 523
- 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 470
34 more
- 2022Masked Autoencoders As Spatiotemporal Learnerscited by 429
- 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
- 2021Multi-attentional Deepfake Detectioncited by 341
- 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 338
- 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 319
- 2018Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Posescited by 297
- 2020Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detectioncited by 287
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 273
- 2018Deep Facial Expression Recognition: A Surveycited by 270
- 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 262
- 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 244
- 2019The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Datasetcited by 209
- 2021WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detectioncited by 209
- 2018Capsule-Forensics: Using Capsule Networks to Detect Forged Images and Videoscited by 180
- 2020Learning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detectioncited by 179
- 2022Self-supervised Learning of Adversarial Example: Towards Good Generalizations for Deepfake Detectioncited by 173
- 2020Two-branch Recurrent Network for Isolating Deepfakes in Videoscited by 161
- 2021Exploring Temporal Coherence for More General Video Face Forgery Detectioncited by 159
- 2019FakeCatcher: Detection of Synthetic Portrait Videos using Biological Signalscited by 145
- 2021Frequency-aware Discriminative Feature Learning Supervised by Single-Center Loss for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 134
- 2022Leveraging Real Talking Faces via Self-Supervision for Robust Forgery Detectioncited by 130
- 2019Recurrent Convolutional Strategies for Face Manipulation Detection in Videoscited by 118
- 2020Emotions Don't Lie: An Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection Method Using Affective Cuescited by 111
- 2022ConvMAE: Masked Convolution Meets Masked Autoencoderscited by 105
- 2021Local Relation Learning for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 100
- 2021Dual Contrastive Learning for General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 100
- 2022Protecting Celebrities from DeepFake with Identity Consistency Transformercited by 95
- 2021Spatiotemporal Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 88
- 2022UIA-ViT: Unsupervised Inconsistency-Aware Method based on Vision Transformer for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 69
- 2020Sharp Multiple Instance Learning for DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 55
- 2022Delving into Sequential Patches for Deepfake Detectioncited by 41
- 2022On Improving Cross-dataset Generalization of Deepfake Detectorscited by 34
- 2022Deepfake Video Detection with Spatiotemporal Dropout Transformercited by 19
- 2021Deepfake Forensics via An Adversarial Gamecited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.