To Make Yourself Invisible with Adversarial Semantic Contours
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern object detectors are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which may bring risks to real-world applications. The sparse attack is an important task which, compared with the popular adversarial perturbation on the whole image, needs to select the potential pixels that is generally regularized by an ℓ0-norm constraint, and simultaneously optimize the corresponding texture. The non-differentiability of ℓ0 norm brings challenges and many works on attacking object detection adopted manually-designed patterns to address them, which are meaningless and independent of objects, and therefore lead to relatively poor attack performance. In this paper, we propose Adversarial Semantic Contour (ASC), an MAP estimate of a Bayesian formulation of sparse attack with a deceived prior of object contour. The object contour prior effectively reduces the search space of pixel selection and improves the attack by introducing more semantic bias. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ASC can corrupt the prediction of 9 modern detectors with different architectures (e.g., one-stage, two-stage and Transformer) by modifying fewer than 5% of the pixels of the object area in COCO in white-box scenario and around 10% of those in black-box scenario. We further extend the attack to datasets for autonomous driving systems to verify the effectiveness. We conclude with cautions about contour being the common weakness of object detectors with various architecture and the care needed in applying them in safety-sensitive scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.
Builds on
58 of 67 references.
References · 58
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
38 more
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,275
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
- 2018Image Transformercited by 770
- 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
- 2020PCT: Point cloud transformercited by 730
- 2022DAB-DETR: Dynamic Anchor Boxes are Better Queries for DETRcited by 569
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
- 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 454
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2019YOLACT: Real-time Instance Segmentationcited by 441
- 2019PointRend: Image Segmentation as Renderingcited by 439
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
- 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
- 2020DetectoRS: Detecting Objects with Recursive Feature Pyramid and Switchable Atrous Convolutioncited by 222
- 2021TOOD: Task-aligned One-stage Object Detectioncited by 218
- 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
- 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
- 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
- 2021Instances as Queriescited by 157
- 2020Probabilistic Anchor Assignment with IoU Prediction for Object Detectioncited by 150
- 2018DPatch: An Adversarial Patch Attack on Object Detectorscited by 146
- 2018Transferable Adversarial Attacks for Image and Video Object Detectioncited by 109
- 2020Dynamic R-CNN: Towards High Quality Object Detection via Dynamic Trainingcited by 103
- 2020AutoAssign: Differentiable Label Assignment for Dense Object Detectioncited by 100
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
3 papers.