mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bringing Diversity to Autonomous Vehicles: An Interpretable Multi-vehicle Decision-making and Planning Framework

arXiv 2302.06803 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2023cs.RO cs.MAcited by 5

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Cooperative and V2X driving

Abstract (arXiv)

With the development of autonomous driving, it is becoming increasingly common for autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) to travel on the same roads. Existing single-vehicle planning algorithms on board struggle to handle sophisticated social interactions in the real world. Decisions made by these methods are difficult to understand for humans, raising the risk of crashes and making them unlikely to be applied in practice. Moreover, vehicle flows produced by open-source traffic simulators suffer from being overly conservative and lacking behavioral diversity. We propose a hierarchical multi-vehicle decision-making and planning framework with several advantages. The framework jointly makes decisions for all vehicles within the flow and reacts promptly to the dynamic environment through a high-frequency planning module. The decision module produces interpretable action sequences that can explicitly communicate self-intent to the surrounding HVs. We also present the cooperation factor and trajectory weight set, bringing diversity to autonomous vehicles in traffic at both the social and individual levels. The superiority of our proposed framework is validated through experiments with multiple scenarios, and the diverse behaviors in the generated vehicle trajectories are demonstrated through closed-loop simulations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Cooperative and V2X driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2023.

Builds on

12 of 31 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  2. 2021IntentNet: Learning to Predict Intention from Raw Sensor Datacited by 158
  3. 2022Learning from All Vehiclescited by 135
  4. 2018Baidu Apollo EM Motion Plannercited by 99
  5. 2022M2I: From Factored Marginal Trajectory Prediction to Interactive Predictioncited by 81
  6. 2018Hierarchical Game-Theoretic Planning for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 48
  7. 2022CitySim: A Drone-Based Vehicle Trajectory Dataset for Safety Oriented Research and Digital Twinscited by 43
  8. 2021Learning to Simulate Self-Driven Particles System with Coordinated Policy Optimizationcited by 33
  9. 2022Social Interactions for Autonomous Driving: A Review and Perspectivescited by 27
  10. 2019Safe Trajectory Generation for Complex Urban Environments Using Spatio-temporal Semantic Corridorcited by 16
  11. 2022Efficient Game-Theoretic Planning with Prediction Heuristic for Socially-Compliant Autonomous Drivingcited by 13
  12. 2022Driving Conflict Resolution of Autonomous Vehicles at Unsignalized Intersections: A Differential Game Approachcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Toward Safety-First Human-Like Decision Making for Autonomous Vehicles in Time-Varying Traffic Flow
  2. 2022Learning-based social coordination to improve safety and robustness of cooperative autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic
  3. 2023Towards Socially Responsive Autonomous Vehicles: A Reinforcement Learning Framework with Driving Priors and Coordination Awareness
  4. 2025Socially-Aware Autonomous Driving: Inferring Yielding Intentions for Safer Interactions
  5. 2025Impact of Collective Behaviors of Autonomous Vehicles on Urban Traffic Dynamics: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach
  6. 2025An Intention-driven Lane Change Framework Considering Heterogeneous Dynamic Cooperation in Mixed-traffic Environment ↗
  7. 2022Game-Theoretic Planning for Autonomous Driving among Risk-Aware Human Drivers
  8. 2025A Human-Oriented Cooperative Driving Approach: Integrating Driving Intention, State, and Conflict