Local Convolutions Cause an Implicit Bias towards High Frequency Adversarial Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial Attacks are still a significant challenge for neural networks. Recent work has shown that adversarial perturbations typically contain high-frequency features, but the root cause of this phenomenon remains unknown. Inspired by theoretical work on linear full-width convolutional models, we hypothesize that the local (i.e. bounded-width) convolutional operations commonly used in current neural networks are implicitly biased to learn high frequency features, and that this is one of the root causes of high frequency adversarial examples. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the impact of different choices of linear and nonlinear architectures on the implicit bias of the learned features and the adversarial perturbations, in both spatial and frequency domains. We find that the high-frequency adversarial perturbations are critically dependent on the convolution operation because the spatially-limited nature of local convolutions induces an implicit bias towards high frequency features. The explanation for the latter involves the Fourier Uncertainty Principle: a spatially-limited (local in the space domain) filter cannot also be frequency-limited (local in the frequency domain). Furthermore, using larger convolution kernel sizes or avoiding convolutions (e.g. by using Vision Transformers architecture) significantly reduces this high frequency bias, but not the overall susceptibility to attacks. Looking forward, our work strongly suggests that understanding and controlling the implicit bias of architectures will be essential for achieving adversarial robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2021A Frequency Perspective of Adversarial Robustnesscited by 28
- 2021Implicit Bias of Linear Equivariant Networkscited by 18
- 2022Joint rotational invariance and adversarial training of a dual-stream Transformer yields state of the art Brain-Score for Area V4cited by 7
- 2025Faces of Fairness: Examining Bias in Facial Expression Recognition Datasets and Modelscited by 6
- 2022Understanding robustness and generalization of artificial neural networks through Fourier maskscited by 3
- 2024Towards a Novel Perspective on Adversarial Examples Driven by Frequencycited by 2
- 2023Linking convolutional kernel size to generalization bias in face analysis CNNscited by 1
- 2026Fast Preemptive Robustification: High-Frequency Response Anti-Aligns Shared Vulnerabilitycited by 0
- 2026FU-Mamba: A Frequency-Enhanced Dynamic Scanning Framework for Oralscan Image Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026FU-Mamba: A Frequency-Enhanced Dynamic Scanning Framework for Oralscan Image Segmentation27 Aug 2026
- 2026Fast Preemptive Robustification: High-Frequency Response Anti-Aligns Shared Vulnerability26 Mar 2026
- 2025Faces of Fairness: Examining Bias in Facial Expression Recognition Datasets and Models16 Feb 2025
- 2024Towards a Novel Perspective on Adversarial Examples Driven by Frequency16 Apr 2024
- 2023Linking convolutional kernel size to generalization bias in face analysis CNNs7 Feb 2023
- 2022Understanding robustness and generalization of artificial neural networks through Fourier masks16 Mar 2022
- 2022Joint rotational invariance and adversarial training of a dual-stream Transformer yields state of the art Brain-Score for Area V48 Mar 2022
- 2021A Frequency Perspective of Adversarial Robustness26 Oct 2021
- 2021Implicit Bias of Linear Equivariant Networks12 Oct 2021