mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ensemble Value Functions for Efficient Exploration in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2302.03439 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2023cs.MA cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) requires agents to explore within a vast joint action space to find joint actions that lead to coordination. Existing value-based MARL algorithms commonly rely on random exploration, such as ε-greedy, to explore the environment which is not systematic and inefficient at identifying effective actions in multi-agent problems. Additionally, the concurrent training of the policies of multiple agents during training can render the optimisation non-stationary. This can lead to unstable value estimates, highly variant gradients, and ultimately hinder coordination between agents. To address these challenges, we propose ensemble value functions for multi-agent exploration (EMAX). EMAX is a framework to seamlessly extend value-based MARL algorithms. EMAX leverages an ensemble of value functions for each agent to guide their exploration, reduce the variance of their optimisation, and makes their policies more robust to miscoordination. EMAX achieves these benefits by (1) systematically guiding the exploration of agents with a UCB policy towards parts of the environment that require multiple agents to coordinate. (2) EMAX computes average value estimates across the ensemble as target values to reduce the variance of gradients and make optimisation more stable. (3) During evaluation, EMAX selects actions following a majority vote across the ensemble to reduce the likelihood of miscoordination. We first instantiate independent DQN with EMAX and evaluate it in 11 general-sum tasks with sparse rewards. We show that EMAX improves final evaluation returns by 185% across all tasks. We then evaluate EMAX on top of IDQN, VDN and QMIX in 21 common-reward tasks, and show that EMAX improves sample efficiency and final evaluation returns across all tasks over all three vanilla algorithms by 60%, 47%, and 538%, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2023.

Builds on

41 of 56 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  2. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  3. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
  4. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
  5. 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
  6. 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
  7. 2016Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 301
  8. 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 257
  9. 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
  10. 2020Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Taskscited by 207
  11. 2019MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Explorationcited by 181
  12. 2017Deep Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 155
29 more
  1. 2020SUNRISE: A Simple Unified Framework for Ensemble Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 150
  2. 2022Mastering the Game of Stratego with Model-Free Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 129
  3. 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 116
  4. 2020Shared Experience Actor-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
  5. 2014Generalization and Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 112
  6. 2016Averaged-DQN: Variance Reduction and Stabilization for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
  7. 2021Celebrating Diversity in Shared Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
  8. 2019Dealing with Non-Stationarity in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
  9. 2019Better Exploration with Optimistic Actor-Criticcited by 88
  10. 2021Scaling Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Selective Parameter Sharingcited by 85
  11. 2019Influence-Based Multi-Agent Explorationcited by 75
  12. 2022A Unified Approach to Reinforcement Learning, Quantal Response Equilibria, and Two-Player Zero-Sum Gamescited by 64
  13. 2021Cooperative Exploration for Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
  14. 2019Measuring the Reliability of Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 49
  15. 2021Episodic Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning with Curiosity-Driven Explorationcited by 49
  16. 2015A Game-Theoretic Model and Best-Response Learning Method for Ad Hoc Coordination in Multiagent Systemscited by 41
  17. 2020Hypermodels for Explorationcited by 37
  18. 2018Successor Uncertainties: Exploration and Uncertainty in Temporal Difference Learningcited by 35
  19. 2022Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Warehouse Logistics with Robotic and Human Co-Workerscited by 28
  20. 2021Decoupled Reinforcement Learning to Stabilise Intrinsically-Motivated Explorationcited by 25
  21. 2022ESCHER: Eschewing Importance Sampling in Games by Computing a History Value Function to Estimate Regretcited by 24
  22. 2022Redeeming Intrinsic Rewards via Constrained Optimizationcited by 24
  23. 2019A Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Resource Balancing in Complex Logistics Networkcited by 22
  24. 2022Efficient Model-based Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Optimistic Equilibrium Computationcited by 14
  25. 2022Pareto Actor-Critic for Equilibrium Selection in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  26. 2022Reducing Variance in Temporal-Difference Value Estimation via Ensemble of Deep Networkscited by 13
  27. 2022Model-based Lifelong Reinforcement Learning with Bayesian Explorationcited by 12
  28. 2021LIGS: Learnable Intrinsic-Reward Generation Selection for Multi-Agent Learningcited by 10
  29. 2020REMAX: Relational Representation for Multi-Agent Explorationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

5 papers.