mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Truthful Incentive Mechanism for Federated Learning with Crowdsourced Data Labeling

arXiv 2302.00106 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.DCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm that trains machine learning (ML) models on clients' devices in a distributed manner without the need of transmitting clients' data to the FL server. In many applications of ML, the labels of training data need to be generated manually by human agents. In this paper, we study FL with crowdsourced data labeling where the local data of each participating client of FL are labeled manually by the client. We consider the strategic behavior of clients who may not make desired effort in their local data labeling and local model computation and may misreport their local models to the FL server. We characterize the performance bounds on the training loss as a function of clients' data labeling effort, local computation effort, and reported local models. We devise truthful incentive mechanisms which incentivize strategic clients to make truthful efforts and report true local models to the server. The truthful design exploits the non-trivial dependence of the training loss on clients' efforts and local models. Under the truthful mechanisms, we characterize the server's optimal local computation effort assignments. We evaluate the proposed FL algorithms with crowdsourced data labeling and the incentive mechanisms using experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2023.

Builds on

24 of 42 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  2. 2019A Joint Learning and Communications Framework for Federated Learning over Wireless Networkscited by 263
  3. 2019Scheduling Policies for Federated Learning in Wireless Networkscited by 131
  4. 2020Client Selection and Bandwidth Allocation in Wireless Federated Learning Networks: A Long-Term Perspectivecited by 103
  5. 2020Joint Device Scheduling and Resource Allocation for Latency Constrained Wireless Federated Learningcited by 90
  6. 2020Collaborative Machine Learning with Incentive-Aware Model Rewardscited by 71
  7. 2020Scheduling for Cellular Federated Edge Learning with Importance and Channel Awarenesscited by 62
  8. 2020Model-sharing Games: Analyzing Federated Learning Under Voluntary Participationcited by 60
  9. 2021Device Sampling for Heterogeneous Federated Learning: Theory, Algorithms, and Implementationcited by 40
  10. 2021Optimality and Stability in Federated Learning: A Game-theoretic Approachcited by 40
  11. 2019Toward an Automated Auction Framework for Wireless Federated Learning Services Marketcited by 38
  12. 2019A Crowdsourcing Framework for On-Device Federated Learningcited by 32
12 more
  1. 2013Crowdsourced Judgement Elicitation with Endogenous Proficiencycited by 30
  2. 2014Optimum Statistical Estimation with Strategic Data Sourcescited by 28
  3. 2021Faithful Edge Federated Learning: Scalability and Privacycited by 13
  4. 2014Double or Nothing: Multiplicative Incentive Mechanisms for Crowdsourcingcited by 11
  5. 2021Federated Learning over Wireless Networks: A Band-limited Coordinated Descent Approachcited by 11
  6. 2016Learning to Incentivize: Eliciting Effort via Output Agreementcited by 8
  7. 2016Sequential Peer Prediction: Learning to Elicit Effort using Posted Pricescited by 6
  8. 2022Personalized Federated Learning with Server-Side Informationcited by 6
  9. 2016The Value of Privacy: Strategic Data Subjects, Incentive Mechanisms and Fundamental Limitscited by 3
  10. 2014The Importance of Being Earnest in Crowdsourcing Systemscited by 1
  11. 2016Parametric Prediction from Parametric Agentscited by 1
  12. 2017Theseus: Incentivizing Truth Discovery in Mobile Crowd Sensing Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.