Learning to Incentivize: Eliciting Effort via Output Agreement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In crowdsourcing when there is a lack of verification for contributed answers, output agreement mechanisms are often used to incentivize participants to provide truthful answers when the correct answer is hold by the majority. In this paper, we focus on using output agreement mechanisms to elicit effort, in addition to eliciting truthful answers, from a population of workers. We consider a setting where workers have heterogeneous cost of effort exertion and examine the data requester's problem of deciding the reward level in output agreement for optimal elicitation. In particular, when the requester knows the cost distribution, we derive the optimal reward level for output agreement mechanisms. This is achieved by first characterizing Bayesian Nash equilibria of output agreement mechanisms for a given reward level. When the requester does not know the cost distribution, we develop sequential mechanisms that combine learning the cost distribution with incentivizing effort exertion to approximately determine the optimal reward level.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
8 papers.
- 2022Optimal and Differentially Private Data Acquisition: Central and Local Mechanismscited by 22
- 2023The Importance of Human-Labeled Data in the Era of LLMscited by 8
- 2023Learnersourcing in the Age of AI: Student, Educator and Machine Partnerships for Content Creationcited by 6
- 2025SelectMix: Enhancing Label Noise Robustness through Targeted Sample Mixingcited by 5
- 2023Truthful Incentive Mechanism for Federated Learning with Crowdsourced Data Labelingcited by 4
- 2021Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Reviewcited by 2
- 2021Incentivizing an Unknown Crowdcited by 0
- 2021Eliciting Truthful Reports with Partial Signals in Repeated Gamescited by 0
- 2025SelectMix: Enhancing Label Noise Robustness through Targeted Sample Mixing14 Sep 2025
- 2023The Importance of Human-Labeled Data in the Era of LLMs18 Jun 2023
- 2023Learnersourcing in the Age of AI: Student, Educator and Machine Partnerships for Content Creation10 Jun 2023
- 2023Truthful Incentive Mechanism for Federated Learning with Crowdsourced Data Labeling31 Jan 2023
- 2022Optimal and Differentially Private Data Acquisition: Central and Local Mechanisms10 Jan 2022
- 2021Eliciting Truthful Reports with Partial Signals in Repeated Games9 Sep 2021
- 2021Incentivizing an Unknown Crowd9 Sep 2021
- 2021Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review27 Aug 2021