SPEED: Experimental Design for Policy Evaluation in Linear Heteroscedastic Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we study the problem of optimal data collection for policy evaluation in linear bandits. In policy evaluation, we are given a target policy and asked to estimate the expected reward it will obtain when executed in a multi-armed bandit environment. Our work is the first work that focuses on such optimal data collection strategy for policy evaluation involving heteroscedastic reward noise in the linear bandit setting. We first formulate an optimal design for weighted least squares estimates in the heteroscedastic linear bandit setting that reduces the MSE of the value of the target policy. We then use this formulation to derive the optimal allocation of samples per action during data collection. We then introduce a novel algorithm SPEED (Structured Policy Evaluation Experimental Design) that tracks the optimal design and derive its regret with respect to the optimal design. Finally, we empirically validate that SPEED leads to policy evaluation with mean squared error comparable to the oracle strategy and significantly lower than simply running the target policy.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2023.
Builds on
30 of 83 references.
References · 30
- 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processescited by 199
- 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
- 2016Optimal and Adaptive Off-policy Evaluation in Contextual Banditscited by 111
- 2016Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendationcited by 102
- 2019Sequential Experimental Design for Transductive Linear Banditscited by 88
- 2019Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkagecited by 87
- 2018Information Directed Sampling and Bandits with Heteroscedastic Noisecited by 75
- 2022Computationally Efficient Horizon-Free Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture MDPscited by 52
- 2020An Empirical Process Approach to the Union Bound: Practical Algorithms for Combinatorial and Linear Banditscited by 45
- 2021Improved Variance-Aware Confidence Sets for Linear Bandits and Linear Mixture MDPcited by 45
- 2017Minimal Exploration in Structured Stochastic Banditscited by 40
- 2015Residual Weighted Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment Rulescited by 37
18 more
- 2020Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation from Multiple Logging Policiescited by 30
- 2017Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation Through Behavior Policy Searchcited by 25
- 2017Efficient-UCBV: An Almost Optimal Algorithm using Variance Estimatescited by 20
- 2021Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Level Set Estimationcited by 17
- 2021Improved Algorithms for Agnostic Pool-based Active Classificationcited by 15
- 2021Robust On-Policy Sampling for Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2022Safe Exploration for Efficient Policy Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 15
- 2022ReVar: Strengthening Policy Evaluation via Reduced Variance Samplingcited by 15
- 2020Deep Jump Learning for Off-Policy Evaluation in Continuous Treatment Settingscited by 14
- 2017Structured Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 11
- 2020Chernoff Sampling for Active Testing and Extension to Active Regressioncited by 11
- 2015Online Learning to Samplecited by 9
- 2020Taking the Counterfactual Online: Efficient and Unbiased Online Evaluation for Rankingcited by 8
- 2017Fast Rates for Bandit Optimization with Upper-Confidence Frank-Wolfecited by 7
- 2017Active Learning for Accurate Estimation of Linear Modelscited by 6
- 2022Variance-Optimal Augmentation Logging for Counterfactual Evaluation in Contextual Banditscited by 6
- 2013An Affine Invariant Linear Convergence Analysis for Frank-Wolfe Algorithmscited by 5
- 2021Safe Data Collection for Offline and Online Policy Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.