Safe Data Collection for Offline and Online Policy Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Motivated by practical needs of experimentation and policy learning in online platforms, we study the problem of safe data collection. Specifically, our goal is to develop a logging policy that efficiently explores different actions to elicit information while achieving competitive reward with a baseline production policy. We first show that a common practice of mixing the production policy with randomized exploration, despite being safe, is sub-optimal in maximizing information gain. Then, we propose a safe optimal logging policy via a novel water-filling technique for the case when no side information about the actions' expected reward is available. We improve upon this design by considering side information and also extend our approaches to the linear contextual model to account for a large number of actions. Along the way, we analyze how our data logging policies impact errors in off(line)-policy learning and empirically validate the benefit of our design by conducting extensive numerical experiments with synthetic and MNIST datasets. To further demonstrate the generality of our approach, we also consider the safe online learning setting. By adaptively applying our techniques, we develop the Safe Phased-Elimination (SafePE) algorithm that can achieve optimal regret bound with only logarithmic number of policy updates.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2021.
Builds on
19 of 62 references.
References · 19
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
- 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
- 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
- 2017Safe Policy Improvement with Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 141
- 2016Optimal and Adaptive Off-policy Evaluation in Contextual Banditscited by 111
- 2016Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendationcited by 102
- 2019Batched Multi-armed Bandits Problemcited by 97
- 2015Cascading Bandits: Learning to Rank in the Cascade Modelcited by 75
- 2020Inference for Batched Banditscited by 63
- 2021Meta-Thompson Samplingcited by 62
- 2016Conservative Banditscited by 58
7 more
- 2016Conservative Contextual Linear Banditscited by 56
- 2021Bayesian decision-making under misspecified priors with applications to meta-learningcited by 43
- 2019Meta Dynamic Pricing: Transfer Learning Across Experimentscited by 41
- 2017Why Adaptively Collected Data Have Negative Bias and How to Correct for Itcited by 36
- 2019Are sample means in multi-armed bandits positively or negatively biased?cited by 24
- 2021Control Variates for Slate Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 13
- 2019Phase Transitions in Bandits with Switching Constraintscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023SPEED: Experimental Design for Policy Evaluation in Linear Heteroscedastic Banditscited by 3
- 2022Risk-Aware Linear Bandits: Theory and Applications in Smart Order Routingcited by 1
- 2024SaVeR: Optimal Data Collection Strategy for Safe Policy Evaluation in Tabular MDPcited by 1
- 2023Efficient and Interpretable Bandit Algorithmscited by 0
- 2024SaVeR: Optimal Data Collection Strategy for Safe Policy Evaluation in Tabular MDP4 Jun 2024
- 2023Efficient and Interpretable Bandit Algorithms23 Oct 2023
- 2023SPEED: Experimental Design for Policy Evaluation in Linear Heteroscedastic Bandits29 Jan 2023
- 2022Risk-Aware Linear Bandits: Theory and Applications in Smart Order Routing4 Aug 2022