mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semantic Parsing for Conversational Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs

arXiv 2301.12217 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2023cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we are interested in developing semantic parsers which understand natural language questions embedded in a conversation with a user and ground them to formal queries over definitions in a general purpose knowledge graph (KG) with very large vocabularies (covering thousands of concept names and relations, and millions of entities). To this end, we develop a dataset where user questions are annotated with Sparql parses and system answers correspond to execution results thereof. We present two different semantic parsing approaches and highlight the challenges of the task: dealing with large vocabularies, modelling conversation context, predicting queries with multiple entities, and generalising to new questions at test time. We hope our dataset will serve as useful testbed for the development of conversational semantic parsers. Our dataset and models are released at https://github.com/EdinburghNLP/SPICE.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2023.

Builds on

27 of 43 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  5. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  6. 2019Text Summarization with Pretrained Encoderscited by 553
  7. 2018The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questionscited by 409
  8. 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 280
  9. 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
  10. 2019CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databasescited by 180
  11. 2020Beyond I.I.D.: Three Levels of Generalization for Question Answering on Knowledge Basescited by 169
  12. 2020A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 142
15 more
  1. 2019SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Contextcited by 141
  2. 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 133
  3. 2015Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networkscited by 127
  4. 2020Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing: Pre-training vs. Specialized Architecturescited by 95
  5. 2021A Survey on Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering: Methods, Challenges and Solutionscited by 77
  6. 2018Complex Sequential Question Answering: Towards Learning to Converse Over Linked Question Answer Pairs with a Knowledge Graphcited by 67
  7. 2019Look before you Hop: Conversational Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs Using Judicious Context Expansioncited by 42
  8. 2022Conversational Information Seekingcited by 36
  9. 2021On Compositional Generalization of Neural Machine Translationcited by 34
  10. 2019Multi-Task Learning for Conversational Question Answering over a Large-Scale Knowledge Basecited by 33
  11. 2022Conversational Question Answering on Heterogeneous Sourcescited by 26
  12. 2021Conversational Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs with Transformer and Graph Attention Networkscited by 24
  13. 2018Learning to Map Context-Dependent Sentences to Executable Formal Queriescited by 23
  14. 2021Structured Context and High-Coverage Grammar for Conversational Question Answering over Knowledge Graphscited by 10
  15. 2021Memory-Based Semantic Parsingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.