mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CRADL: Contrastive Representations for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Localization

arXiv 2301.02126 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2023cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised anomaly detection in medical imaging aims to detect and localize arbitrary anomalies without requiring annotated anomalous data during training. Often, this is achieved by learning a data distribution of normal samples and detecting anomalies as regions in the image which deviate from this distribution. Most current state-of-the-art methods use latent variable generative models operating directly on the images. However, generative models have been shown to mostly capture low-level features, s.a. pixel-intensities, instead of rich semantic features, which also applies to their representations. We circumvent this problem by proposing CRADL whose core idea is to model the distribution of normal samples directly in the low-dimensional representation space of an encoder trained with a contrastive pretext-task. By utilizing the representations of contrastive learning, we aim to fix the over-fixation on low-level features and learn more semantic-rich representations. Our experiments on anomaly detection and localization tasks using three distinct evaluation datasets show that 1) contrastive representations are superior to representations of generative latent variable models and 2) the CRADL framework shows competitive or superior performance to state-of-the-art.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2023.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  3. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  5. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
  6. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  7. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
  8. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
  9. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
  10. 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 531
  11. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 453
  12. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
12 more
  1. 2020Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 186
  2. 2020Autoencoders for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation in Brain MR Images: A Comparative Studycited by 147
  3. 2018Deep Autoencoding Models for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation in Brain MR Imagescited by 146
  4. 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
  5. 2019BIVA: A Very Deep Hierarchy of Latent Variables for Generative Modelingcited by 109
  6. 2020Hybrid Models for Open Set Recognitioncited by 109
  7. 2019Unsupervised Anomaly Localization using Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 73
  8. 2020Unsupervised Lesion Detection via Image Restoration with a Normative Priorcited by 65
  9. 2018Context-encoding Variational Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 64
  10. 2020Anomaly detection through latent space restoration using vector-quantized variational autoencoderscited by 45
  11. 2021Unsupervised Brain Anomaly Detection and Segmentation with Transformerscited by 34
  12. 2021Challenging Current Semi-Supervised Anomaly Segmentation Methods for Brain MRIcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

3 papers.